The following is a translation of a leaked “letter of concern” circulating on social media, submitted by senior officers of the Maldives National Defence Force (MNDF) to Chief of Defence Force Major-General Ali Shiyam on September 28. Following the release of the letter the MNDF amended its regulations to punish officers who promoted “upheaval and chaos”. Brigadier General Abdulla Shamaal was subsequently removed from his position as the Commandant of Training and Doctrine,while First Lieutenant Abdulla Shareef (Marine Corp), Sergeant First Class Ali Waheed and Lance Corporal Sharhaab Rashid were dismissed from service. First Lieutenant Mohamed Haleem resigned, stating “For the last 23 years [of my military service]; I have served this country under a solemn oath taken in the name of Allah, I do not see any way that I can carry out my duties as prescribed in the constitution and the military act, while in this position, therefore I request you to relieve me from my duties.”
To Chief of Defence Force Major General Ali Shiyam:
Whereas Article 236 in Chapter 9 of the Republic of Maldives’ Constitution states the Maldivian security services, consisting of the Military Service and the Police Service, is established to enable all persons in the Maldives to live in peace, security and freedom,
Whereas Article 237 states the security services shall protect the nation’s sovereignty, maintain its territorial integrity defend the constitution and democratic institutions, maintain and enforce law and order, and render assistance in emergencies,
And whereas Article 238 states that the actions of the security services must be exercised in accordance with the Constitution and the law, and operate on the basis of accountability,
And whereas Article 111 states that if no candidate wins by over fifty percent of the votes in a presidential election, a run-off election must be held within twenty one days of the first election,
And whereas Article 142 states judges must comply with the constitution and the law,
On 7 September 2013, a presidential election was held as per Article 110 of the Constitution. The Elections Commission announced a second round of election on 28 September 2013 as per Article 111 of the constitution.
According to Article 111 of the constitution, a second round of election must be held within 21 days after the first election, and that date is 28 September 2013. We believe, given Article 8 of the Constitution states that the powers of the state shall be exercised in accordance with the constitution, and as 28 September 2013 is the last date on which the second round of the presidential elections can be held, the Supreme Court order to delay the election is one that creates dangers for the nation and its citizens and creates challenges from a national security point of view, and may impede the military from carrying out is constitutionally mandated duties.
As per Article 237 the security forces are mandated with defending democratic institutions, and maintaining and enforcing law and order.
Given the shifting national security atmosphere in the country, and as the Maldivian state’s independent institutions and the international community are repeatedly calling for all parties to respect the constitution, we believe any military act that violates constitutional rules and democratic norms, will destroy the sovereign state established in the Maldives, destroy law and order in the country, and allow for a military state to be established in the Maldives.
This is due to influential actors who may abuse the turmoil and constitutional void following the delay in presidential elections. We are concerned that the chain of command established in the military as per the laws will be lost, and will allow for the military to be used as a tool to hand over administration of the state to a certain group of people.
Article 245 states that no one is allowed to issue an illegal order to a member of the security services and that members of the security services should not obey such an order. Hence, due to orders issued in the above mentioned situation, this institution [military] may fall into a deep pit, and we fear that subordinate commanders and lower ranks may be legally locked into a dark cell and may be criminally charged at a later date.
Hence, we express grave concern, and appeal for this institution not to be propelled into a deep pit, and state that we will steadfastly remain with good military behavior and good order against any illegal order.
28 September 2013
Signed:
Brigadier General Shamal
Colonel Abdul Raheem
Brigadier General Ahmed Jihad
Brigadier General Ahmed Nilam
Colonel Hamid Shareef
Lt. Colonel Nasrulla Majdhee
Captain Abdul Muizz
Lt. Colonel Ibrahim Hilmee
Sergeant Major Hassan Fawaz
Sergeant Major Naushad Ali
First Lieutenant Abdulla Shareef
First Lieutenant Mutholib [unclear]
Sergeant Major [first name unclear] Vaseem
[name unclear]
[name unclear]
Captain Hassan Amir
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Transcript: MNDF Staff Sergeant Shafraz Naeem’s CoNI account of Feb 7 mutiny- Senior military officers send “letter of concern” to Chief of Defence Force
- No US base under discussion, only joint training exercises: Defence Minister
- The future of motor racing in the Maldives: The Piston Cup Challenge
- “We have been off the streets for some time – now we are back”: MDP
- Declined foreign intervention on February 7: former President Nasheed
Wait a minute. THIS is creating "discord" within the military?
Really?
What?
r u f-ing cereal>
"... and will allow for the military to be used as a tool to hand over administration of the state to a certain group of people."
Seems like certain parts of the military are actually thinking along those lines. What's for sure is that the details of this power transfer are now taking place. The Supreme Court has been told to sit on its verdict.
(1) It's all quite obvious. It's been two weeks since the Supreme Court concluded its hearings and started looking for those 40,000 votes that mysteriously went to MDP instead of Gasim.
(2) If, as Gasim and Saeed claimed that it'd take just a few days to verify their claims of massive election fraud, even the incompetent Supreme Court would have found out the scams by now and declared the first round null and void.
(3) So, why has the Supreme Court failed to do so? Why have they failed to pass judgement on a seemingly simple case of massive election fraud which should have been obvious once they started looking at the records?
Ladies & gentlemen, the answer is obvious.
Speaking from a purely legal perspective, the problem with this letter resides here:
"According to Article 111 of the constitution, a second round of election must be held within 21 days after the first election, and that date is 28 September 2013."
Issuing authoritative interpretations of the Constitution and the law is within the sole jurisdiction of the courts. I must appeal to those who signed this document to remember that the role of the courts in this regard is an established principle of democracy.
No institution or person has the authority to interpret the law according to their views. If we all were to begin doing so then I'm afraid we would be throwing the country into a deeper blacker pit than any other action ever could.
The reason why courts are instituted within every country is to prevent multiple interpretations of the law which lead to chaos, confusion and conflict.
Remove all the gloss and candy-coating from this document and it is merely a statement that a certain verdict to be delivered by the courts tomorrow will not be accepted by the undersigned and that they will break the chain of command and follow their interpretation of the law to their ends.
The solution to this problem lies with amending or interpreting Article 245 and other related Articles of the Constitution which talks about unconstitutional/illegal orders issued to the security forces. What constitutes an "illegal" order must be left for the courts to decide unless such an order is manifestly illegal (for e.g.:- an order to murder all the first born males in the country).
This whole fiasco began when a certain section of the police force was allowed to mutiny according to their own interpretation of the law on 7 February 2012. That incident set a precedent for similar incidents to repeat. The purpose of any criminal proceedings against Ex-President Nasheed in the future must squarely set the blame and liability for unconstitutional orders on the civilian political command. Uniformed bodies are supposed to follow the chain of command and are not required to engage in lofty discussions of the law and a legal review of every order before implementing it.
It took a while for the regime and its supporters to line up the dominoes. But that's done now. It will all begin to tumble tomorrow. The Supreme Court is readying itself.
(1) Ali Hameed will be rewarded with a life time's worth of adultery with prostitutes of his choice and rivers of white wine. Must be heaven (minus the virgins) on earth for him right now. Are we all just jealous?
(2) There is no question. The coup that started on 7th February 2012 will not allow the people to chose their leader. Its either Gasim or Yameen for the next 5 years. Pain and suffering lies ahead.
May Allah bless the unfortunate people (except certain politicians, judges and other assorted scoundrels) of the Maldives.
Hey tsk tsk, if arresting looters is unconstitutional, then why are we paying the police for? If they're gonna take our money and f*** around dancing with looters, then they all deserve to be hanged.