Economic Development Minister Ahmed Mohamed has claimed in local media that the value of the US Dollar against the Maldivian Rufiyaa is not expected to fall in the “near future”, citing the need for a new long-term financial strategy.
Criticising the previous government’s decision to amend local dollar exchange rates – capped at Rf12.85 until April last year – in an attempt to alleviate black market trading of foreign currency, Ahmed claimed a new approach to foreign investment was needed to alleviate the supply situation.
“After Ramadan, we will announce several new projects. This would be a solution to the dollar problem,” he told local news service Sun Online yesterday.
Ahmed also hit out at the previous government’s decision to discontinue charging import duty to instead impose a General Goods and Services Tax (G-GST). The tax, which was passed by parliament last year rose to six percent from 3.5 percent yesterday while import duties were lowered or eliminated for a range of commodities starting January 1, 2012.
The Tourism Goods and Services Tax (T-GST) was meanwhile raised to six percent for 2012 as stipulated in the GST Act.
Despite Ahmed’s criticisms, two former economic ministers serving within the administration of former President Mohamed Nasheed claimed last month that they were confused by the seemingly contradictory measures of increasing import duties whilst reducing GST.
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Q&A: Finance Minister Ahmed Inaz- GMR failed to conduct political risk assessment prior to investing, says President Yameen
- Government says “iconic” Malé-Hulhulé bridge can be finished in two years
- Maldives Monetary Authority introduces new 100 rufiyaa note
- Comment: ‘Mega-loot’ – the murky and frightening sale of MACL
- Maldives must address “deteriorated” tourist services to protect industry: Chamber of Commerce
We should not have abolished the custom duty and should have zero duty for staple foods and rest of the items should continue to have duty with GST.
T-GST should maintain at 6%.
The other major problem was that Anni had changed the resort rental basis to reduce the resort rents for some of his close Resort owners where they had gained so much from the rent payable to the Government.
Anni should have kept the Resort rent as it was and then should have gone with the GST 6% and then Government would have earned enough money to sustain the economy.