Category:

Dear Editor,

A lot has been happening this year since this government came into power to address violence against women and children, in parliament and in the administration and in the community. We have seen the growth of various pressure groups in the country to support the cause of the abused in this country. Bills have been submitted to parliament to address the abuse against children and the violence that we see in our streets. The new hotline for children introduced by this government is a huge step forwards as the dynamics of being in small tight communities that we live militate against the protection and trust of those who seek support.

Where things are not moving is the judiciary and therein lies the heart of the problem. Perhaps the judges lack education and appropriate training. Perhaps they are indifferent to the plight of our women and children who come to them seeking justice. Perhaps the judgements they have been making against our children and women in courts are grounded in their personal belief systems.

What we know is that the current systems in place for women to seek divorce and for women and children to seek protection from domestic violence and to seek justice for the trauma of violation and violence is inadequate and needs attention urgently.

We walk on egg shells around this topic just as we do in our abusive relationships. I believe it’s time now to start a national debate on this matter. Look with truth and courage at the structures, systems, customs, beliefs and practices that dishonour women and our children in our society.

We need to qualify and quantify the spiritual, financial, emotional and social cost to those who have suffered violence and been violated in our families and in our communities. We need to set up witness protection systems, safety nets, safe houses and ensure investigations into these matters are conducted with integrity and a high degree of safety. As we need legislature that protects women and children from domestic violence.

I believe we have come to a critical stage in our new democracy where we are not just being challenged by the forces that oppressed us for thirty long years but also by forces that seek to oppress our women and children and impose on us cultural norms alien to our society in the name of Islam.

We must raise our voices collectively and close ranks against these forces if we are to assure our daughters of a future which honours women and children in the modern Islamic state that we aspire the Maldives to be.

Regards,

Shafeea

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Dear Editors,

I wish to point out some serious factual errors in the article “The Paateys: Heroin Addiction in the Maldives” dated January 13, 2005

“After your first few uses of Brown Sugar, the body will builds up a tolerance to the drug, which means you need to take more and more to get the same high you did on your first go” = not everybody necessarily develops a tolerance.

“If you voluntarily go to the Narcotics Control Board and report that you have a problem you won’t go to jail, but you’ll be put under house arrest until a place is available at the Maldives’ only rehab clinic and there you will be held for up to a year.” = volunteer cases are handled with top priority and they are sent almost on the same day as they come in. Usually the delay is on the volunteer’s part or the family’s wish, for the volunteer to spend a day or two getting ready for the trip.

And in the case that there is no space for a volunteer in the rehab center, which I haven’t come across, quiet honestly, I don’t see the reason why that person should be put under house arrest and hopefully you are aware of the fact that NNCB (previously NCB) has no such authority to put people under house arrest!

The other factor is that, people rarely stay in the rehab for a year. They are usually out in 6 months or so. The length depends on the progress of the client.

“The only rehabilitation centre in the Maldives has been described as more of a jail than a rehab centre.” = I wonder whether you actually talked to people who have been to both the Jail and the Rehab? Only such a person could tell you the differences.

“Drugs councillors are usually recruited between the ages of 17-20 and many are school drop-outs. They are approached by the Narcotics Control Board, who, after sending them on a counselling crash-course for 6 months, will let them loose on the patients. I don’t see how you can properly train a drug-addiction councillor in six months, especially if they are dealing with serious cases of addiction” said the drugs councillor.

= When recruiting counsellor’s for NCB, the position is advertised in the newspapers. It is clearly stated that they should have had at least C grade passes in at least 2 O/level subjects, and a pass in Dhivehi and Islam (minimum D). Is that what you call school drop outs?

I was one of the first five counsellors recruited to be trained as a drug counsellor and I had 4 A/level passes at that time. I dare you to name one person who is currently employed by NNCB and who is a counsellor. Of course I don’t mean for you to include a couple of counsellors who, finished their Rehab term and because of their good behaviour and commitment to the on going treatment and their interest in the field of counselling were given chances, Yes these kids were school dropouts, they were also “drug addicts”, but NCB takes the initiatives to give these kids a second chance to be productive citizens. It would be nice for you to appreciate that too.

And yeah the “crash course” yeah, initially they do undergo, a 6 month course but you forgot to mention the training follow-ups. they are sent to the nearby regions for further training courses, namely to Malaysia, Singapore, India and Sri Lanka and New York.

Training to become a counsellor takes a lot of time and studies. perhaps you are mistaking the trainee counsellors for the counsellors? NCB only gives the job of a counsellor for degree holders. I only got that job title after I finished my first degree. The other relevant designations are , counsellor trainee, assistant counsellor gr1, gr2, and counsellor gr1, and gr2. So next time, please don’t choose to “diss” on the people who are
trying hard to get something done!

The care available to those who are able to get a place at the rehab centre is also far from sophisticated. The ‘treatment’ is to go ‘cold turkey’, which essentially means locking a patient in a room without access to any drugs and where the patient is unable to commit suicide. = Clients are never locked up. True, when we didn’t have a detoxification center (which you have not mentioned in your article), clients were only given mild pain killers and other relevant medication.

I am just wondering whether you are even aware of the existence of a Detoxification center? Are you aware that NCB has had its own psychiatrist (not counting the frequent visits from Dr. Eswaran – the IGMH psychiatrist). NCB also has its own clinical psychologist. There are four counsellors with bachelors degrees (two currently studying for masters degrees), two assistant counsellors with diplomas, two trained from the famous Daytop in New York and others trained from Pengasih/Malaysia and four from Pertapis /Singapore. A lot of them had undergone training in TTK hospital in India, and from NIMHANS/ Bangalore, India and the rest from countless little training programs.

It is always disheartening for me to see, us the people who work in the field, constantly blamed for everything under the sun.

You have mentioned a lot of good stuff in your article such as the social problems. But a good article gets bad because of factual errors in it.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

President Mohamed Nasheed gave an impassioned speech at the UN summit on climate change at New York yesterday, urging international action against global warming rather than just empty pledges.

The president, who followed US President Barack Obama in speaking order, said from his observations, once the dust of the rhetoric had settled at climate change conferences, “sympathy fades, indignation cools, and the world carries on as before.”

“We in the Maldives desperately want to believe that one day our words will have an effect, and so we continue to shout them even though, deep down, we know that you are not really listening,” he said.

Nasheed said developed countries must acknowledge their historic responsibility for global warming and accept emission reduction targets consistent with an average temperature increase below 1.5 degrees celsius.

Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said if climate change continued unchecked, global temperatures would rise by up to 6.4 degrees celsius within a century, leading to frequent cyclones, heat waves and heavy rains.

World leaders convene at the Danish capital in December to hammer out a successor to the Kyoto Protocol in what is widely perceived as an eleventh hour attempt at keeping the worst consequences of climate change at bay.

Responsibility

Despite several high-level meetings so far this year, negotiations have stalled between the developed and developing world. While countries such as India and China argue the onus of curbing emissions is on rich, industrialised nations, the latter are loth to commit.

Speaking yesterday, Nasheed said developing countries must play their part under the “principle of common but differentiated responsibility”. The transfer of technological know-how and finance from rich nations to poor was further essential in achieving global cuts to emissions.

“I would argue that the threat posed by climate change is now so acute, the science so clear, the solution so apparent, and the cost-benefit analysis of action and inaction so alarming, that such horse-trading and brinkmanship must be left in the past,” he said.

Failure to reach broad agreement in Copenhagen would be morally inexcusable, economically short-sighted and politically unwise
Ban Ki-Moon
UN Secretary-General

Addressing members yesterday, both the US and China expressed similar commitment to cutting emissions. Obama said while developed countries such as the US were responsible for taking the lead on climate change action, the developing world must also cooperate.

Further, the global recession should not be used as an excuse for complacency. “Unease is no excuse for inaction…Each of us must do what we can to grow our economies without endangering our planet, and we must do it together. We must seize the opportunity to make Copenhagen a significant step forward in the global fight against climate change.”

Likewise Chinese President Hu Jintao said his country was committed to tackling climate change.

“We will endeavor to cut carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by a notable margin by 2020 from the 2005 level,” he said. “Second, we will vigorously develop renewable energy and nuclear energy. We will endeavor to increase the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to around 15 percent by 2020.”

Time to act

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon who opened up the meeting stressed the urgency of tackling climate change, which if unchecked would result in the Arctic being ice-free by 2030.

He said he was moved by the eloquence of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and the impact that climate change will have on their future existence.

Yesterday, AOSIS unanimously passed Nasheed’s call for their declaration to be framed in positive rather than negative language to emphasise what can be achieved. The declaration calls for a cap in temperatures of 1.5 degrees as well as financing to help islands adapt to global warming.

“Climate change is the pre-eminent geopolitical and economic issue of the 21st century,” continued Ban Ki-Moon. “It rewrites the global equation for development, peace and prosperity. It will increase pressure on water, food and land…. reverse years of development gains…. exacerbate poverty…. destabilise fragile states and topple governments.”

While, many thought tackling climate change was an expensive undertaking, he added, failure to do so would wreak inestimable damage.

The UN secretary-general added a successful new deal must commit to ambitious targets, help vulnerable countries, have financial backing and be equitable to the needs of developing countries.

“Failure to reach broad agreement in Copenhagen would be morally inexcusable, economically short-sighted and politically unwise,” he said. “We cannot go down this road. If we have learned anything from the crises of the past year, it is that our fates are intertwined.”

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)