As the best hope of unraveling the tangled events surrounding Nasheed’s resignation on February 7, the failure of the CoNI ought to put to rest attempts to determine what happened on that fateful day, writes Daniel Bosley for the Eurasia Review.
CoNI represented the light at the end of the tunnel that has been the country’s attempts at political reconciliation since February. Assembled by Presidential decree and reconstituted by international request, the inquiry has become increasingly important as parallel all-party talks failed to get off the ground.
The revelation that Nasheed’s representative on the commission, Ahmed Gahaa Saeed, was unhappy with the report on Monday suggested that its public release on Thursday would be a disappointing anti-climax. His resignation on Wednesday confirmed it.
It also confirmed the reality that no legal document, governmental report, or political opinion will ever change the differing versions of events that are indelibly scored into the hearts and minds of Maldivians.
After six months of going round in circles, it is time to face reality and find the best way to heal the nation – starting from where it is today – on the edge of a precipice.
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Will the new President’s ‘conciliatory mode’ last, asks the Eurasia Review- Fears of judicial process being used to derail election justified: Eurasia Review
- Nasheed to ‘go it alone’ in run-off: Eurasia Review
- Elections looking smooth – but what about transition period, asks Eurasia Review
- Maldives turning into ‘terrorist haven’: Eurasia Review
- Unrest rising with no reconciliation in sight: Eurasia Review
