“Our judiciary has some bright minds, but that does not exempt it from scrutiny; judiciary in the Maldives, with the exception of few courts and judges, the judiciary as a whole has earned a deservedly bad reputation for its inconsistent judgments, lack of leadership, lack of competency and being out of touch with modern laws and views of the society.”
So says Dr Mohamed Jameel Ahmed, the current Minister of Home Affairs, writing in Haveeru today.
“Holders of the judiciary were given security of tenure through the appointment of Magistrates and judges by an independent commission. Supreme Court justices recommended by Judicial Service Commission and nominated by the President were appointed by the Parliament.
Holders of the office of the judiciary were further secured with the provision that they could only be removed by a two third vote of the Parliament. The legislatures pinned their hopes of establishing an independent judiciary.
It was the desire of the nation to see not only an independent judiciary but also competent professionals leading it, and who are able to fulfill the expectation of a nation on the verge of embracing new found democracy, and whose inhabitants have over the years acquired knowledge and skills in various professions.”
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Comment: The green-eyed judiciary and the green constitution- ACC to probe Civil Court Judge bribe claim
- Q&A: “Silent coup has become the armed coup” – Aishath Velezinee
- JSC appeals Civil Court injunction against investigation of Abdulla Mohamed
- “Sunlight is the best antiseptic”: the case for an independent judiciary
- Quitting Commonwealth will be “a huge mistake,” says vice president
