This article first appeared on the website of the UK High Commission. Republished with permission.
Like many I was saddened by the execution of the Sri Lankan housemaid Rizana Nafeek in Saudia Arabia last week.
The UK has been actively supporting calls for clemency, not least because there is evidence to suggest that Rizana was a minor at the time of the alleged murder she committed (UK statement on execution).
The UK and fellow EU Member States are strong advocates for abolition of the death penalty (which is no longer permitted in the EU). Last autumn we tried to encourage both Sri Lanka and Maldives to join us in supporting the UN moratorium on the Death Penalty. Despite supporting the previous UN motion in 2010, this time both countries chose to abstain.
Although both Sri Lanka and the Maldives have legislative provision for imposing the death penalty, neither country has carried out judicial executions for some time (since 1976 in Sri Lanka and 1953 in Maldives).
But in both countries there have been recent calls for the reintroduction of the death penalty to help combat some of the more serious crimes. As someone who has worked with very serious offenders in previous jobs, I personally doubt the efficacy of capital punishment as a means of deterring crime and the research I have seen bears this out.
Of course for some people and cultures retribution is an important part of the argument.
It’s natural to feel anger and to desire revenge when we have been wronged. But part of the role of an impartial justice system is to remove emotion from the consideration in order to arrive at an objective assessment of the facts.
This is not to say that the victim’s wishes or feelings should be ignored, but a more dispassionate approach reduces the prospects of a miscarriage of justice. And after an execution, mistakes can, of course, never be rectified.
For others, forgiveness is a stronger impulse.
I was humbled to read the recent comments of Mrs Nimalaraja, a Sri Lankan whose husband was killed by a 14 year old boy in the UK last summer. Following the sentencing of her husband’s assailant last week she said: “I am not angry any more. Before, I was angry because I lost my husband, but I am not angry now. The boy is a child and he didn’t mean to kill Nimal – it was an accident.”
For Mrs Nimalaraja – who attended every court sitting – understanding what had happened and seeing justice done was more important than heaping heavy punishment on the perpetrator.
Robbie Bulloch is the UK Deputy High Commissioner to Sri Lanka and the Maldives
All comment pieces are the sole view of the author and do not reflect the editorial policy of Minivan News. If you would like to write an opinion piece, please send proposals to [email protected]
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Q&A: UK Deputy High Commissioner Mark Gooding- UK visa forms to be accepted in Malé from August
- Maldives High Commission in Sri Lanka seeks Islam, Dhivehi teachers
- British High Commissioner calls on President Yameen
- President Yameen to make official visit to Sri Lanka in late January
- Maldives Coastguard joins training with India and Sri Lanka counterparts
This article doesnt have anything to do with maldives,this is between srilanka and saudis,i will just say this if the saudi decision was based on modern law with scientific/forensic evidence to claim the maid deliberately killed the child it can be excepted but based on kangaroo laws no decent human being can accept it
Death sentence needed here.
No Bulloch-it.
Sadly kangaroo laws tend to go with execution - i.e. not the best combination for lawmaking, but perhaps the most tempting for said kangaroos (apologies to the animal kingdom)
How many innocent Palestinians children and women are killed and yet you are silent! What mockery!!
As former American President Jimmy Carter said:
"As you know, the United States is one of the few countries, along with nations such as Saudi Arabia, China, and Cuba, which still carry out the death penalty despite the ongoing tragedy of wrongful conviction and gross racial and class-based disparities that make impossible the fair implementation of this ultimate punishment."
He has a point.
I don't think death penalty would solve anything beyond the brief respite of seeing an unwanted being executed.
Especially in a place like Maldives where the system is as broken as can be, I cannot trust the current judicial system to carry out this punishment without bias.
I imagine in a few years we would be hearing about not just criminals who commit henious crimes being executed, we would be hearing about women being executed for fornication, men and women executed for homosexuality, we would be hearing about opposing political party members being executed and we would be hearing about cases where the suspects are executed without properly looking into evidence.
Rizana Nafeek, the sri lankan girl was sent to Saudi with a fake passport saying that she was 23 yeas age but actually she was only 17.
And she was not given a fair trial in Saudi courts. There was no trnaslater during the 1st hearing and she had no clue what was going on.
This muder was not proven without any doughts.
This execution was extremly unfaire.
The poor girl paid the heaviest price.
Tsk Tsk, every other criminal; be it a minor killer or a rapist or a serial killer is protected by the glorious dinosaur brains of the advanced Apes but the innocent victims are never highlighted or even mentioned by these so well developed neanderthals.
PS;weird how these neanderthals claim that the mother has the full authority to kill her innocent child in the womb(abortion) but then again protest the killing of a molester or murderer through 'gisas'
Neanderthals will be neanderthals, i guess!!!???