Q&A: CEO of GMR Male’ International Airport, Andrew Harrison

Indian infrastructure giant GMR and Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB) have formally taken over the reins of Male’ International Airport, the beginning of an expansion project that includes the construction of a new airport terminal by 2014 and the refurbishment of the existing terminal in just 180 days.

Minivan News speaks to the CEO of GMR Male’ International Airport, Andrew Harrison, the man now in charge of making it happen.

JJ Robinson: What stage does the airport currently stand at following the official handover on November 25?

Andrew Harrison: The focus so far has been on engagement with employees, and bringing together various stakeholders. An airport is like a community, with customs, immigration, Maldives National Defence Force (MNDF), ground handling and all the other services involved. We want to ensure people work together as a community and recognise that each depends on the other to make sure the experience for the passenger best it can be.

The development aspect involves hard construction, but it is very important to look at development of the people – the greatest asset we have. If we develop our people they will look after our business.

JJ: How is the situation different now compared with when GMR first arrived?

AH: An initial challenge was that we had a ground handling company, MACL, and another company that did cleaning and inflight catering. We were not taking the catering but we were taking the cleaning. So you have three different companies with three different organisational cultures that now need to merge into one, and add the culture of GMR Airports.

People ask what apprehensions I had – I wondered how we were going to merge these organisational cultures together. That was the real challenge. Having said that, people responded very well. There were lots of issues where there were differences between those companies, so we had to work to iron out those differences,

JJ: What were an example of some of those differences?

AH: The amount of leave people received in the three companies was different, so we standardise that so one isn’t perceived as having more than another. There are obviously differences in pay scales as well, but that has to be addressed over a longer period of time.employees. to integrate and look at aspects skills, performance and reviews of 1513 employees takes a period of time.

JJ: You had a high success rate retaining employees to the new airport company?

Airport CEO Andrew Harrison at the handover ceremony (left)

AH: It was 100 percent. [Initially] we had a few people overseas on training and it took a bit longer to get the documentation to them. We had a process with the government of the Maldives and MACL. In the conditions for handover we had to demonstrate the implementation and success of the plan, and we had a daily report on how many people on the list passed to us accepted our offer and conditions. I’m pleased to say it was 100 percent.

In terms of people development we are now looking at training programmes. We are just about to send 25 fire and rescue staff to Malaysia for three and a half months of training.

I was interested in that training being not just an assignment, but something people will value and recognise and help to advance themselves. So I said we will invite the parents by surprise to go to the passing out parade of the two best students – best improvement and best overall student – so they can watch their sons be recognised for the distinction they have demonstrated in their learning. I think that is a way we are showing that we are going the extra mile.

In terms of development, the new terminal will be completed in late summer of 2014, and will be really designed to reflect the beauty of Maldives. The terminal will have large glass facades, and natural materials people are used to seeing in resorts, skylights to allow natural light in, and natural water bodies and water features surrounding terminal so you always have that feeling of being close to water. That’s one of the reasons people come to the Maldives.

As for the refurbishment of the existing terminal, we [have launched] a 180 day terminal improvement programme. In the concession agreement we are given one year to complete it, but we have decided to do it in six months.

In those six months we will look at improvements in processing capacity, such as baggage reclaim, capacity of the check-in counters, and centralised security screening – there are two at the moment. This will give passengers greater time in retail area and reduce queuing.

JJ: The GMR bid was particularly generous on the fuel revenue sharing with the government (27 percent from 2015), and less so with the sharing of airport revenue (10 percent from 2015). How will GMR justify such a low margin on fuel?

AH: Today in global airport development there is a balance between aeronautical revenue and non-aeronautical revenue. Aeronautical revenue includes typical revenue from aircraft landing and parking, direct charges to airlines and passenger fees.

But in these challenging times there is continuing pressure to reduce the burden of aeronautical charges. The development of the last few years has been an emphasis on non-aeronautical revenue, as the burden of fuel costs, and engineering costs has increased significantly.

We look at the non-aeronautical development as being part of the commercial arrangement, including the the utilisation adjacent land, conference facilities, hotels, things that actually compliment our services. Our strategy in the long term is a greater focus on these.

At same time, we will focus on the development of the economy as a whole. Because the airport is literally a gateway, an economic engine. It facilitates trade, travel and employment. Generations of Maldivians have worked at this airport and we see this as continuing.

We see ourselves as having a much wider remit – for example, today there is the resurgence of Sri Lanka. 10-12 years ago people booked a 14-day holiday, with 10 days in Sri Lanka, four days in Maldives. They would spend five days in Sri Lanka, come over to the Maldives for four days and go back for five.

When the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) problems arose in Sri Lanka, people came to the Maldives because of the perception of increased security and reduced risk.

Now Sri Lanka has put the LTTE difficulties behind them, we now have the difficulty of the resurgence of Sri Lanka. Now we run the risk people going back to Sri Lanka because it cheaper – and you can do many things there that you can do in the Maldives. In my opinion it’s not as beautiful, and it’s not as exclusive, but not everyone wants to pay that [higher] price in the Maldives.

We are also looking at developing much better traffic between the Maldives and the United States. Today it is the most under-represented nationality in terms of visitors to the Maldives. We have airlines like Qatar Airways and Emirates so we know we have flight connectivity which will allow seamless transfer.

JJ: How do you convince a country like the US to fly to the Maldives instead of closer and more developed destinations such as the Caribbean and Bahamas?

AH: They will be other destinations the Maldives competes with – Hawaii for the US and the Canary Islands for the UK. Fiji to a much lesser extent, which serves Australia and New Zealand.

There is competition with Mauritius to far lower extent, because even though it is a far bigger island it doesn’t attract the number of visitors that the Maldives does.

Curiously, one of the reasons I discovered for this is because the temperature of the water is cooler so divers have to spend less time diving compared to here where our average water temperature is 26 degrees.

JJ: The fuel trade has historically been a key component of the airport’s income, will that continue?

AH: With the fuel trade today we have means of procuring and supplying fuel to the airlines. The airlines also have some of their own arrangements, because they take advantage of global purchasing deals, and companies that supply them in other countries also supply them here.

What we are doing is looking at the existing contracts, and simply reviewing how we can enhance consumer gets. Some airlines like greater term of credit, other airlines a term of time – we have to match various needs and at the same time remain a competitor in the region.

JJ: There have been concerns that such a high fuel share with will compress your own fuel revenue, which could involve passing on the cost and potentially make it more expensive for the airline.

AH: No, I think the strategy we recognise is that we have experience introducing efficiencies. MAHB has 39 airports, GMR has three airports. Between two of us we can leverage what we know and bring that advantage here, and that will make us more efficient.

Because what drives the price of fuel is the cost. If we become more efficient providing fuel we can manage the implications going forward. We have studied that very carefully so that it represents a very good deal for the people of the Maldives and us as business, and also the consumer, be they a passenger or airline.

JJ: How big a part of the airport’s revenue do you expect the fuel trade to be?

AH: It’s not an issue for us, to be honest. We have so many advantages through being able to help the government to influence amount traffic coming in, and in the airport. That doesn’t just mean duty free but food and beverage, transfer services – there are so many needs passengers have here because of the uniqueness of the way people arrive and depart from the Maldives.

The seaplane operation, for example, is an example of how we collaborate. In our original design for the terminal the arrivals section sat on top of the seaplane operation. We are now adjusting that because we recognise how important the seaplane operation is to the Maldives – 60 percent of arrivals are transferring to seaplanes.

What I’d like is that once you come out of arrivals after clearing customs, you have three choices: seaplane transfer, boat transfers to resorts, and passenger transfer to Male’. It is very straightforward and more importantly it is very efficient.

We see many opportunities with the non-aeronautical developments once we complete the terminal development. We have proposals in terms of developing the land area [around the airport],and that is where we see the opportunities.

The concourse of the new terminal

JJ: What is your own background, and what do you bring to the operation?

AH: I have worked for GMR for five years and before that the TBI group in the UK, which ran 26 airports.I have worked 13 airports around the world.

I guess what I bring is an understanding of how an airport can be developed efficiently within a stakeholder environment, looking at needs of a country as a whole, where we are a facilitator of the economy while ensuring the development of leadership qualities in people so they can take over managing the airport.

In a period of five years, we would like this airport to be managed entirely by Maldivians. And some of those Maldivians will move onto our other projects. My real role is to mentor and lead our team here and develop them to go onto bigger and better things.

JJ: An airport is a complex operation – has it been hard to find skills such as qualified engineers?

AH: It has not been a challenge because Maldivians are very talent and very dynamic. They are very self-sufficient. I have guys here in engineering who are able to do virtually anything. It’s amazing, it’s a new skill, and I think to myself, ‘Wow, if we’d had people like this working in India those projects could have been done in half the time.’

We have a lot to learn from Maldivians here, but at the same time we have a lot to share with them.

We recognise that a lot of people have gained their skills through time spent in that department – that doesn’t mean they are in touch with current trends, products and processes that have changed over time to make things more efficient. We are also going to send people to other airports in our group, to give them exposure.

It’s not a matter of finding technological capacity – what we recognise is that we can enhance skills greatly with training and exposure to other airports.

JJ: What have been some of the key challenges here?

AH: There have been a few. I think one of the challenges has been perhaps the misunderstanding people have had – and that’s really changed – about what we are here to do.

There was an earlier misconception that we were going to put a thousand Indians on a boat and set sail for the Maldives and replace everybody here with Indians because it was cheaper labour and would be our preference. But clearly it is not. We are not doing that. Our manage structure at the leadership level is a combination of Maldivians and non-Maldivians. We will learn from them, and share what we have learned. Our challenge is to transfer knowledge to them and harness what they have learned so we can use them in our other airports.

Then the next time we bid for an island airport I’ll know exactly who to call on to take leadership roles in that airport, because I know guys who run a great island airport here.

The second misconception has been that we have come in here to increase all the rates.

JJ: Former Deputy Leader of the opposition Umar Naseer famously stated that the airport deal “will allow Israeli flights to stop over after bombing Arab countries.” How do you respond to such rhetoric?

AH: We look at it, and the information in the media at moment. I find here that people are intelligent and forward thinking, and they able to determine what is fact and fiction. We have full confidence in general public’s ability to discern that.

I think a challenge we faced was the notion that we were coming in and increasing charges. The CEO of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) has said their members prepared to pay increased charges, provided they see improvement in the airport in terms level or service and the development of airport. Clearly they will see that [in the Maldives].

Our mandate is to review the cost of providing services, determine what every stakeholder wants, and determine at what cost we can provide that.

We have airlines who have come to us and told us that the lounge is not what they expect, and that they would like to build their own lounge – three airlines have come forward to build their own lounge – but cant have everyone building their own lounge because we don’t have enough space for that. But what we can say is, ‘What do you require?’

For instance, only one airline currently has a first class service into Male’. All the rest have a business class and economy service, and sometimes premium economy. But the airlines are telling us that some of the passengers arriving on business class are in fact first class passengers, who have flown from London to their hub in first class, but then in business as a downgrade. To all intents they are a first class passenger with first class expectations, and as a result of that the kind of lounge the expect is not the kind they get.

We are working to determine that. But the person on the street may decide ‘You’ve come in here and built a new lounge and now you’re charging more money for it.’ But what they don’t see is the airlines requirement to actually have that facility, because the facility that is there does not meet the standards they expect it to.

These are some of the areas there are misconceptions that are not clear to the public and may be misconstrued.

Exterior of the new terminal, at night

JJ: On the subject of fact and fiction, I’m sure you’re following Maldivian politics with great interest – one of the current issues involves bribery allegations concerning GMR, denied by the Speaker of Parliament Abdulla Shahid and Leader of the Opposition Ahmed Thasmeen Ali, involving them travelling to Delhi on tickets purchased by GMR. Once and for all – has GMR had any contact with the Speaker of Parliament or the Leader of the Opposition?

AH: I think for the interests of clarity, we are extremely privileged to have this opportunity to manage the airport, and the GMR Group will at all times want to confine itself to that responsibility – and nothing else. Because that’s what we’re good at – we are no good at politics. And so we try to stay away from issues such as those.

What I can tell you is that any of the meetings and discussions that we have with anyone in government today have been open, well-known and available to the public. We go to public meetings, and we have other stakeholders present in these meetings. So for us, there is no question of anything occurring that would be shrouded in secrecy, or not known to the public.

Certainly I can tell you I have no knowledge of anything like that taking place. This seems to be something going on between people outside of GMR, although somehow we have appeared in the frame.

Those parties allegedly involved will be able to determine between themselves what is fact and what is fiction.

JJ: Former Deputy Opposition Leader Umar Naseer has claimed he has a letter from Sri Lankan Airlines confirming the authenticity of tickets purchased by a travel bookings company used by GMR, FCM Travel Solutions [shows ticket]. Has GMR flown these two individuals to Delhi?

AH: We don’t have a travel company, we use different travel service providers – we don’t use a defined company. I can’t comment on what Sri Lankan is saying because that information is privy to the airline that made the booking. Certainly anything we do is in the public domain. So if that were the case, it would be something publicly known and something people would be aware of.

This is something between the parties, the airline, and those who allegedly have been involved in purchasing whatever, and who are making the allegations. We honestly wouldn’t be able to comment on that. Because we have no knowledge of this, to be quite honest.

JJ: Have GMR made any efforts to determine the the source of the opposition to the airport, or the concerns of the coalition of parties opposed to it?

AH: No, because we have decided very clearly that our remit is to manage the airport, and we feel it is important to confine ourselves to this remit.

Otherwise it becomes very easy to confuse our mandate here and what people may perceive we are here to do. All of our attention is focused on the airport and demonstrating that we are an airport operator that will be responsible and respectful of the society and culture, and the laws of the Maldives.

As a result of that, I don’t think you would find us doing anything that goes beyond the boundaries of this airport, other than the relationships with those involved who have anything to do with the development of the airport.

JJ: This opposition coalition group have previously said they may take back the airport if elected, suggesting this could potentially become a campaign issue. Are you worried that a change of government could precede nationalisation spree?

AH: No, it’s not really a concern for us. Because quite frankly we are very pleased with the transparent process in which the bid was managed and assessed and awarded, and supervised by an independent body.

I think once people see the new airport, nobody is going to want to undo what has happened to it. We have staff who are motivated and engaged and telling us that this is an environment very different to the one in which they were working before, and they are very excited by these changes. And we have stakeholders who have welcomed the changes we have made until today.

Passengers coming through this airport haven’t been telling us that there is something they don’t like about how the airport is being managed. So our job is to manage the expectations of consumers and stakeholders to transform the airport into a much better experience. I think by doing that, we will address any concerns people outside the airport community have about us being suitable people to run the airport.

I would like to say that this airport belongs to the people of the Maldives, and nothing is going to change that. We may have financial responsibility for the airport, but physical ownership of the airport will always remain with the people of the Maldives.

What we are doing is continuing the evolution of the development off this airport from the volunteers who in the 1960s came to build it through sweat and toil into what it is today. This evolution continue, as will growth in tourism and trade. We are simply a guardian, a custodian of this national economic asset.

JJ: No concerns about sea level rise?

AH: No. When we became involved in the bid process we engaged three leading companies who are at the forefront of analysing geophysical activity, climate change and the impact rising sea levels.

What we can tell you today is that the risk of rising sea levels coming above the land is so low that it’s not even considered in the insurance premiums for the Maldives.

Insurers are notorious for considering even unimaginable risks, so I can tell you that if no insurance company considers this in any of their policies for the Maldives, we think that the risk is pretty low.

We are the largest single investor now in the history of the Maldives, and to make this kind of investment we would have had to had confidence that this investment would survive not just the term, but leave a lasting legacy. Beyond 25 years we want people to remember what happened while GMR was here. So it is not in our interest to invest in something that may not be here for the full term – and that term goes beyond the concession period.


12 thoughts on “Q&A: CEO of GMR Male’ International Airport, Andrew Harrison”

  1. Congratulation GMR, and congratulations the people of Maldives. I believe GMR Male' International Airport will be something we all will be proud of. I hope we all make the best of this opportunity to improve ourselves, and build something here in Maldives that would be of top world class. In such a big undertaking, obviously there will be challenges and difference in opinion, but I trust we all will work to the best interest of our nation, instead of politicizing everything and ruining ourselves in the bickering of the two parties. I hope we Maldivians take this opportunity positively, move forward with wisdom and the courage to imagine and realize a better future.

  2. Hats off to President Nasheed for giving Male International Airport to MGR on a management contract on "condition to develop the airport". No issues with this.

    However, the government must ensure MGR develops the Airport not just "according to a plan that they propose" BUT in accordance with the needs of the Airport to cater for the projected growth in passenger traffic and to transform Male Interational Airport into a world class airport, within a reasonable period of time.

    To achieve this goal the following areas will need to be addressed (in addition to a world class modern terminal building). They are:-

    1. Increase Apron Space
    2. Provide additional Taxi ways
    3. New Runway
    4. Install aero bridges (I see none in the concept plans).
    5. The Arrival and Departure Terminals as well as other Airport Facilities must be able to cater for the expected growth in passenger traffic for the next 15 years (minimum) and should be planned in a way to enable future expansion of these facilities.
    6. New Air Cargo Terminal(have not seen any mention of a Cargo Terminal) with freezing facilities to cater for the export of fish and storage of other imported perishables). Should be planned to handle expected cargo traffic for at least 10 to 15 years).
    7. New VIP Terminal/Lounge
    8.Proper Arrival/Departure facilities for water taxi-s and other speed boats/dhonies. People should be able to arrive and depart without getting wet in the rain.
    9. Consolidated Seaplane Arrival/departure Terminal (no individual terminals for operators to conserve space)
    10. State of the art modern security systems.

    These are just a few areas and not an exhaustive list.

    I sincerely hope that the Government will ensure this. Failure to do so would be a huge blunder of gigantic proportions!

    Good Luck MGR!

  3. "MAHB has 39 airports, GMR has three airports"

    I think Male' Airport is in capable hands having experience of 42 airports.

    Do wonderful job. All the best.

  4. @ Z-nut

    "Do wonderful job. All the best."

    What is this naivety, z-nut! They are interested in the money only.

    If you privatize and handover your toilet to them they would come out without flushing. They are just interested in relieving their bowels!
    We are the ones who are going to have to clean all the mess when they finally leave it. Don't you ever use your brain even by mistake?

  5. @ heck

    "They are interested in the money only"

    Typical stupid comment from you. Of course they are interested in the money! What's wrong with that? MGR is a business organization. Naturally they would want the venture to be profitable. Why else would they invest? or why should anybody invest for that matter?

    The government doesn't have the money to develop the airport to international standards nor the manpower or know how to manage it at the required high standard.

    The country desperately needs to upgrade the airport to cater to the the projected increase in traffic, and needs to do so within a short period of time.

    So, it is the right decision to privatize the "management of the airport". The country will always be the owner of the airport. The management contract is only for 25 years. A rather short period of time for an investment of this size.

    But as I have written in my earlier post it is vital for the government to ensure that the "final product" that MGR delivers is according to our needs (see some specific areas I have commented on above).

    The revenue sharing formula is not the most important aspect of the deal. It is the "end product".

  6. I think this is good choice. We have borrowed more money to develop the airport than anything else in the country. In fact 65% of all the government loans are to various airport projects. Today we have an opposition who is there to find fault of anything and everything. Investors don't come for political gains. They come to make money. Simple as that. I think we should give GMR all the support. We can judge them the way how they train the Maldivians and the allowances and benefits the staff are going to get. This must be our yard stick, rest is between GMR and the government.

  7. @ Jameela

    "I think this is good choice. We have borrowed more money to develop the airport than anything else in the country. In fact 65% of all the government loans are to various airport projects."

    I think that shows the real nature of this Government. They think they will not be able to control corruption and they would not even touch that sensitive area. That is why since Anni came to power corruption has increased contrary to 'heyo verikan'.

    They have no faith in Maldivians and thinks the country can only be run by putting every thing we own on jumble sale.

    At this rate one day the State will have nothing of it's own.

    We might as well change 26th July, our Independence Day, to read as INTERDEPENDENCE DAY.

    The word INDEPENDENCE and 'minivankan' has no meaning in our dictionary and 'radheef'

  8. @ Jameela

    I voted for Anni and still support him. But I am not a blind follower of him or anybody else for that matter.

    Supporting the government does not mean saying yes blindly to everything the government does like the "yes men" who surrounded Maumoon in the past.

    You say the most important thing to consider in this MGR deal is the "training & allowances that they will offer locals" and the "rest is between the government and MGR"! Like hell it is!!

    The Airport's management is being given to MGR to "develop the airport"! It must be done according to the nation's needs. It can be developed to international standards and planned in a way to cater for future expansion and still be economically feasible and profitable to MGR. It is the Government's DUTY to ensure that it is developed to the required standard (see my earlier posts) and not just build a nice terminal building. Period!

    MGR and the Government must unveil details of the development plans of the Airport to the public as soon as possible. This a must! The public have a right to know the details of this development.

    The successful implementation of this project will the single biggest achievement of this Government. So don't be naive and let it fail!

  9. @heck,

    No heck, U are wrong. GMR is a reputed company having good experience in developing airports. They have recently done Terminal-3 in Delhi and before that Istanbul (Turkey) Int'l airport and before that Hyderabad. If we don't play politics in ruining our airport, they would definitely do good job as their reputation is at stake here.


Comments are closed.