The second hearing in the alcohol possession and smuggling trial of Maldives Development Alliance (MDA) leader and MP Ahmed ‘Sun’ Shiyam has been cancelled for the third time in two months.
According to the Criminal Court, a scheduled hearing was cancelled today as the court was unable to deliver the summons chit.
Media reports that the presiding judge has been changed have today been denied by the court.
In March 2012, customs officers at Ibrahim Nasir International Airport (INIA) discovered a bottle of alcohol in the MP’s luggage. After a police investigation, the case was forwarded to the Prosecutor General’s (PG) Office in August 2012 before being returned to police due to incomplete information.
The relative speed at which cases related to opposition MPs have travelled through the justice system prompted the Maldivian Democratic Party to seek a no-confidence motion against then PG Ahmed Muizz.
Muizz’s subsequent resignation last November has indirectly led to the current crisis in the country’s courts.
Shiyam was eventually charged – more than a year later – although a hearing scheduled for November 7 2013 was cancelled after a summons chit was not delivered to Shiyam.
The Criminal Court subsequently ordered police to present the MP in court, after which he appeared for the first hearing on March 13, 2014.
With local media reporting that Shiyam was kept in the guest area of the court – unlike other suspects – Shiyam denied the charges and requested more time to research the case.
A scheduled hearing for April 10 was again cancelled due to Shiyam’s absence from the capital, with the rescheduled hearing also cancelled as the court was unable to deliver the chit.
An unannounced hearing was attempted on March 27 prior to these official hearings, while Judge Ahmed Sameer Abdul Aziz – who is presiding over the case – was on leave. Citing an anonymous source at the court, local media outlet CNM reported that Criminal Court Chief Justice Abdullah Mohamed was behind this attempt.
“[Criminal Court Chief] Justice Abdulla [Mohamed]was to finish the case. In this regard he sent summoning chits to witnesses while they have not even been presented [by the state], and tried to hold a hearing today at 10am,” CNM quoted the official as saying.
The attempt eventually failed after after a number of court officials were absent from work, CNM was told.
While the case was not on the hearing schedule published on their official website, the court’s spokesperson told CNM such arrangements were not unlawful.
Replacing the judge
Meanwhile local media has reported that the court has now replaced Judge Abdul Aziz with Judge Shujau Usman upon Shiyam’s request.
The Criminal Court has denied these reports, saying that today’s hearing had also been scheduled to be conducted by Judge Abdul Aziz.
The media has published contents of a letter attributed to Shiyam which requests the removal Judge Abdul Aziz from the case stating the he has a personal grudge against the Meedhoo MP.
The letter, dated 24 April 2014, and addressed to to Chief Justice Ahmed Faiz is said to states that, during the first hearing, Judge Abdul Aziz displayed hand gestures and facial expressions which suggested the possibility of acting impartially against Shiyam.
It stated that Judge Abdul Aziz was also displeased with the MDA leader following his complaints, and that Shiyam had received information the judge may be considering a hastened and strict verdict against him.
The letter described the case against Shiyam as “a devious plot by some powerful people” and a politically motivated lie invented by Shiyam’s enemies.
If found guilty, Shiyam could lose his seat in the parliament as per Article 73(c)(2) of the constitution which states that members will be disqualified upon receiving a criminal sentence of more than twelve months would.
Import and possession of alcohol without a special permit form the Ministry of Economic Development is is a criminal offence in the Maldives. The penalty for the crime under the Unlawful Imports Act is 1-3 years imprisonment, banishment or a fine between MVR1000 – 5000.
5 thoughts on “Sun Shiyam’s alcohol possession trial delayed again”
Hypocrisy is ridiculous
this seems a bit fishy to me. i think someone deliberately did this to him? why would a resort owner, who can any amount of alcohol at his own freaking resort would want to smuggle a bottle of alcohol. it just doesn't add up.
The issue is getting clouded here.
This is for possession and importation of illegal goods into the country.
Also, In reality what about the consumption?
This is no different to the way the porn case is being handled. Absolutely none.
klyfer on Mon, 19th May 2014 11:38 PM.
What you say can really be true!
But I feel that if there was this item in his baggage, he has to prove that it was the work of someone else or whatever!
And my belief is that he should stand trial like everyone else found bringing in anything prohibited!
And can avoiding trial, changing judge, and all this scenario prove he is innocent?
Or can some one not say he is trying to avoid standing trial because he is guilty?
Can't these be summed up to something fishy too! I wonder!
Comments are closed.