More than fifty inmates from Maafushi jail serving sentences for the possession of less than three grams of drugs have been transferred to house arrest under a rehabilitation programme, the Department of Penitentiary and Rehabilitation (DPRS) has said.
Moosa Azim, deputy superintendent of the jail, told Minivan News both the transferred inmates and their families have signed a declaration agreeing to regular urine tests and monitoring to ensure they remain under house arrest.
“They have been transferred under a rehabilitation programme as our regulations allow it for inmates sentenced for possession of less than three grams,” he said.
Mohamed Zuhair, president’s office press secretary, said the transfer of inmates was originally targeted for 10 December, World Human Rights Day.
“But it was delayed due to legal issues and because it requires inter-sectoral cooperation, as many institutions such as the DPRS and parole board are involved,” he said.
Zuhair said the president was concerned that inmates eligible for release have not been “given relief” one year into the new government.
Shortly after coming to power, the new government released 119 inmates to house arrest under the parole system.
Vice-President Dr Mohamed Waheed was put in charge of a committee to compile a list of inmates eligible for release.
Dr Waheed visited Maafushi jail as well as the temporary jail in Addu to speak to inmates and learn their concerns, Zuhair said.
The committee will oversee the establishment of a mechanism to ensure monitored telephone calls from inmates to their families, he said.
The committee reviewed the cases of inmates based on certain categories, Zuhair explained, such as inmates eligible for transfer to house arrest or rehabilitation centres and those sentenced under “old definitions” of the old constitution, which considered the possession of one gram to be ‘dealing’.
Inmates who spoke to Minivan News today said DPRS officers came with a handwritten list of 60 people on Friday and “gave all of them haircuts”.
One inmate said they were informed that there was not enough space in the rehabilitation centres and the programme would be conducted in Male’.
After contacting the inmates’ families, both were made to sign a declaration for the release.
But, they said, some inmates who were on the list were not taken, including two who were sentenced for possession of more than three grams.
“They told me there was no space on the dhoni (boat) and I can go tomorrow,” said one inmate. “But the next day, when my family called them, they said there was a slight problem.”
He claimed several inmates were left back at Maafushi after signing the agreement.
“My family was very disappointed,” he said. “I felt very sad because we already signed it and I was ready to leave.”
Both Zuhair and Azim said the list prepared by the president’s office was “not final” and information was still being verified.
A bill on clemency and commuting sentences proposed by the government is on the agenda tomorrow for the third and final reading.
Zuhair said the president’s office was doing what it could for inmates before the legislation was passed, while more would be released in the future.
“The absence of laws is no reason not to give everyone their legal rights,” he said.
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
MDP cries foul over government refusal to honour deal- Independence Day celebrations kick off with fireworks
- Nasheed’s sentence was commuted to house arrest before state decision to appeal
- PG to appeal former president’s terrorism conviction
- Government tight-lipped over rumors of a pardon for Nasheed
- Foreign freeholds will not threaten Indian Ocean security, assures President Yameen
Rehabilitation is encouraged, but releasing criminals into the society is not. We all know what happens when these 'presidential pardons' take place every time. After the 2003 pardon, (which I believe is the beginning of the current style of street violence in the Maldives), the streets of Male' were comparable to those in Johannesburg.
And speaking of rights, what about the rights of those whom these criminals violated? Most of those convicted drug abusers are not simply addicts. They are usually convicted because of other drug-related offenses such as petty theft, burglary, etc.
After all, if the government's plan to rehabilitate prisoners (or to let free those related to top government officials or both) fail, it is the government that is going to get all the blame. We will wait and see.
I have seen many difficulties in Maldives prison, some of them been in jail with out basic.
And mostly Maldives prison run as not prison in any other country, due to it's security, staff corruption and many more, prisoners can get whatever they want.
Basically i really support rehabilitation, but we can't lose criminal that take our society into danger,
Now I am beginning to really lose confidence in this government.
Where are the people who shouted at Gayyoom saying that crimes were increasing becox he was influencing the judiciary and so on?
Now what v see is the criminals being released after being convicted. What about the resources wasted by police and the courts during the process?
I think v first nyd to have a system for rehabilitation before releasing these criminals. But now, it is vice versa. I wonder if this government would even be able to do that.
When they say serving inmates sentences for the possession of less than three grams of drugs, what about the lengthy other crimes those inmates have committed? This is really outrageous.