Day: November 10, 2009

Poor maintenance and management of supplies at the Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital (IGMH) in the past led to waste of over Rf10 million (US$778,200), Mohamed Zubair, the hospital’s CEO revealed.

Speaking at a press conference yesterday, Zubair said the hospital’s material management system was not properly utilised when the board took over in June and equipment at storage did not tally with the system.

“Our system shows that about Rf10 million has been wasted on medical supplies and other related items,” he said, adding the waste could be reduced when the system was properly used.

He added about 95 per cent of the work on tallying the items has now been completed.

“We are now working on establishing the material management system, that is storing and medical supplies, up to ISO certified standards,” he said. “This is necessary to reduce waste.”

Health Minister Aminath Jameel said information was not easily available in the past.

“For example, with supplies, they didn’t know what was in the warehouses,” she said. “There’s a lot of equipment that we got after the tsunami. So, we have found out in the past year that there’s a lot of equipment in different warehouses. In Male’ and the atolls. There was a lot of waste.”

She added a lot of equipment in storage was unused.

While there was a lack of resources in some areas, the health minister said, unnecessary purchases had been made for others.

Further, she said, the new government had to pay over Rf18 million (US$1.4 million) from this year’s budget for inherited unpaid bills.

The ministry had to postpone various projects due to budget constraints, she said.

Zubair said the hospital purchased a new CT scan machine in October, adding it would greatly assist in diagnosing heart diseases.

Among problems faced by the hospital in catering to the public was excessive leave-taking by staff, he said.

Although it negatively impacted the hospitals productivity, he said, IGMH had to give the leave under the Employment Act.

Zubair said IGMH had 500 nurses, but 60 per cent were on leave most of the time. “So we’re able to use about 250 or 230,” he said.

Following discussions with India’s Shri Chitra Institute, he added, the hospital has secured three placements for Maldivian neurosurgeons and cardiologists.

The lack of a cardiologist at the hospital has lead to increasing complaints from the public.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

The Islamic Democratic Party (IDP) has asked the Elections Commission (EC) to remove 5,044 people who signed for the party last year from its official registry.

Speaking to Minivan News yesterday, Umar Naseer, leader of the party, said the party received over a 100 complaints from people claiming they did not sign for the party.

“So the committee decided to remove the whole batch,” he said. “This is because the same team collected the signatures from all over the country in 2008.”

He added the team could not provide adequate explanations to the questions raised by the committee.

Umar said he estimated the removal of the new members would leave just over 1,000 members in the party.

Mohamed Hassan Manik, vice-president of the party, told Minivan News yesterday that Umar acted unilaterally and his behaviour was “unacceptable”.

“He did it on his own using staff from his company,” he said. “The party’s national council has to approve or have a say in the matter according to the party’s regulations.”

The EC does not have to process the request since it was done in violation of the party’s rules, he said.

But, Umar denied the council had to be informed. “There’s a management committee formed to oversee matters of party members. It does not have to inform the council,” he said.

Umar said the decision was made after the party received a letter from the EC asking for verification of its membership to allocate funds for next year’s budget.

“So we felt the time had come to make a decision,” he said.

In August, a resolution to dissolve the party proposed by Umar was rejected by six out of nine council members.

Umar said yesterday that plans to dissolve the party are still ongoing and he will propose it again at the party’s next congress.

He added the party’s regulations stipulated that a congress must be held every year.

Following the resolution, Umar has been active with the main opposition Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party and told Minivan News at the time that he made the decision after the party failed to win a seat in the parliamentary election.

“The present party system in the Maldives is set now,” he said. “There are two major parties and there’s no future for smaller parties such as ourselves, so there’s no point in keeping a party for the sake of it and using public funds.”
Hassan Manik told Minivan News that six members out of the national council’s 11 signed a letter calling for Umar’s resignation.

Manik said yesterday that the council was still seeking his resignation.

In late August, Umar changed the locks of the party’s office, leading the council members to call him a “dictator”.

But, Umar told Minivan News he decided to close the office because he did not want to use public funds to run the party any longer. “We spend more than Rf12,000 (US$900) on electricity, Rf4,000 (US$300) on rent and Rf2,000 (US$160) on cellphone bills,” he said.

Manik said the IDP president had indicated he would join DRP. “Umar Naseer’s fear is that without him, IDP will attach itself to MDP and attack him,” he said.

The party had no plans of joining the ruling Maldivian Democratic Party, he said, and would instead focus on holding the government accountable.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Foreign Minister Dr Ahmed Shaheed has narrowly survived a vote of no-confidence initiated by the opposition Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party-People’s Alliance (DRP-PA) coalition.

 
Of the 73 MPs in attendance, 37 MPs voted in favour of the motion, two abstained and the rest did not participate in the vote. A majority of the full membership of parliament, or 39 votes, was needed to remove the foreign minister.
The DRP-PA coalition has 35 MPs. The independents who voted in favour of the motion were Eydhafushi MP Ahmed “Redwave” Saleem, Guraidhoo MP Ibrahim Riza, Kurendhoo MP Ahmed Moosa and Kudahuvadhoo MP Ahmed Amir.

As speaker, Keyodhoo MP Abdullah Shahid of the DRP could not vote, while Feydhoo MP Alhan Fahmy of the same party joined the MDP MPs and other independents in not participating in the vote.   

The two MPs who abstained were Kulhudhufushi South MP Mohamed Nasheed, an independent, and Maamigili MP Gasim Ibrahim of the Republican Party.
Presenting the motion, Thohdhoo MP Ali Waheed of the DRP said it was based on allegations that the foreign minister misled the public regarding ties with Israel and placed his personal interest first.

“[It was submitted] because we have seen behaviour from Dr Shaheed in formulating the country’s foreign policy and implementing it that did not befit a government minister and because we see that he has put his personal interest above the nation’s to remain as a minister by any means possible,” he said.

At a press conference on 15 September, he continued, the foreign minister said the government was in the process of establishing ties with Israel and he did not see any reason not to pursue it.

But, Waheed said, on 25 September it was reported in the international media that the Israeli foreign ministry had confirmed that diplomatic relations had been established and important agreements had been signed.

“So far the Maldives’ foreign ministry has not issued a statement about this,” he said.

Waheed said although Shaheed told Haveeru Daily on 7 October that diplomatic relations would not be established without properly explaining the matter to the public, the foreign ministry had issued a press release 16 days before about agreements that were signed with Israel.

“Arab-Islamic countries and especially OIC [Organisation of Islamic Conference] countries will definitely not approve of the Maldives establishing such ties with Israel,” he said.

He added establishing ties with Israel would compromise national security and lead to terrorist organisations targeting the Maldives.

Defence

In his statement, Shaheed denied that full diplomatic ties had been established with Israel.

As the motion was sent to the foreign ministry on the afternoon of 27 October, he said, the minimum 14-day notice stipulated in the constitution had not been given.

“On 17 November, 2007, regarding the motion of no-confidence against the attorney general, the speaker of the parliament at the time ruled that it could not be accepted as it was submitted without a substantial reason,” he said.   

While a precedent had been set, he continued, it was questionable why the motion was tabled.

Shaheed said a vote of no-confidence could be justified only in cases where a minister had committed a serious crime or grossly neglected his duties.

The opposition’s motion did not fit the criteria as it does not back up the allegations with specific examples or clarify how his personal interest was prioritised, he said.

The only agreements signed with Israel were Memorandums of Understanding for assistance in tourism, agriculture and health, he continued, while the claim that the Israeli foreign ministry announced that ties had been established was untrue.

A statement on the Israeli foreign ministry website stated that the agreements were an important “first step to normalise relations”, he said.

Shaheed offered copies of agreements for diplomatic ties and other documents that prove the former government decided to normalise relations with Israel in June 1994 under three phases.

The three phases were allowing Israelis to travel to Maldives, announcing opening up of trade and establishing full diplomatic relations. 

Shaheed further offered copies of a research that showed that countries that established diplomatic relations with Israel did not face terrorist attacks.

Other small countries such as Micronesia that vote with Israel at the UN have not been attacked, he said.

Further, he added, 27 countries in the OIC had diplomatic ties with Israel.

Concluding his statement, Shaheed said it was regrettable that MPs had neither questioned him nor summoned him to a committee to clear up the allegations before submitting the motion.

“Whether or not Maldives has established ties with Israel is clear in black and white,” he said. “It does not leave any room for debate. It can be cleared up by a single phone call, a single letter or a single website.”

Debate

During the debate, MDP MPs and some independents severely criticised the opposition for submitting a motion based on unfounded allegations.

Most MPs said the motion was politically motivated and was intended to hamper the government.

Opposition DRP-PA MPs spoke about the atrocities committed by Israel against the Palestinian people.

Ungoofaru MP Dr Afrashim Ali and Vili-Maafanu MP Ahmed Nihan quoted verses from the Quran that cautioned against friendship with Jews and Christians.

Ali Waheed said if Shaheed was strapped to a polygraph test, the machine would blow up.

Alhan Fahmy, who voted against the party line, said he met the foreign minister and found that the allegations were untrue.

The opposition’s activities should be more responsible and since the president was empowered to formulate the foreign policy, the no-confidence vote should be against him.

“The reason we show should be acceptable,” he said. “Today, I don’t believe that this reason is valid. This is a very sad day in my political career as I have to talk against the party that I sacrificed for.”

He added that seeking a motion of no-confidence against the foreign minister did not amount to holding the government accountable.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Dear Editor,
There is much speculation about the outcome of the no-confidence motion against the foreign minister. As much as such a motion is unpalatable to the government, such things cannot be avoided in the democratic process. Even if the foreign minister survives the motion, his reputation is tarnished not least by his own actions. Dr Shaheed in his defense is trying to convince the Majlis memebers that even during the previous regime, the government was reaching out to the Israelis.
Didn’t the people vote in this government because they wanted change, not only a change of a few faces, but also a change in the way government is run? So why is Dr Shaheed trying to justify his actions saying it was done earlier. I think that the foreign ministry is one of the few places where you don’t see much change and this can be evident when you visit our missions abroad. Unlike other countries who change their mission staff with the change in government, we are still going on with the same lot as if there is nobody capable enough to replace them. Even if there is a regime change tomorrow, we will see the same faces since the present lot were sent there by the previous regime in the first place.
I think deep down what matters to certain “big shots” is not adherence to an ideology but the gut necessity to cling on to what one has at any cost and hence one sees this inter-hopping from one party to another regardless of what that party stands for.
Maybe in time this will change and Maldives will have a mature democracy with equally mature political actors.
Regards,
Anonymous

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Dear Editor,
I feel that Dr Shaheed has proven to be a hypocrite and a liability for the whole nation. His conduct is unbecoming of a Maldivian foreign minister. Dr Shaheed’s recent baseless allegation accusing Russia of committing more atrocities against Muslims than any other country in the world alone is enough to remove him from office. Even if the allegation is true, it is unnecessary for our foreign minister to make such an accusation at a time when we enjoy good relations with Russia. Such irresponsible behavior should not be tolerated.
Regards
Anonymous

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)