Expat doctors deserting Maldives

Expatriate doctors are deserting the Maldives because of poor facilities and uncertainty over their pay, according to a doctor working at Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital (IGMH).

“We’ve lost five expat doctors in the internal medicine department in the last four months,” said Dr Ibrahim Shiham. “Only one has been replaced, and from an island so not a new recruit.”

Foreign medical staff are vital to the country’s health services and comprise 85 per cent of the country’s doctors, according to Shiham, most of whom come from India with some from Nepal and Pakistan.

Many are showing reluctance to renew their contracts, Shiham claimed, because the latest round of cuts to government salaries have added to the uncertainty that followed the efforts to standardise civil servant renumeration in January.
“What actually happened was a lot of pay scales were streamlined, and doctors’ basic salary, including allowances, was ultimately down 30 to 40 per cent. So what [the government] did was invent another allowance to take it to the original break-even level. But the extra allowance has no legal standing, and in theory doctor’s salaries got a major decrease.”

With their salaries “propped up and not in the rulebook”, many expatriate doctors “started talking about leaving and looking for other opportunities,” according to Shiham.

“People who’ve been working [in IGMH] for 14-15 years have begun leaving in the last four months,” he added, when their contracts come up for renewal – something he says was rare in the past. “They realised that once they sign the contract there’s not much they can do [if the allowance is withdrawn].”

Deputy Director of the Health Ministry, Abdul Samad Abdul Rahman, said three specialists and six medical officers had left the Maldives in the last two months, and that replacements were declining offers because of the lower wages. CEO of IGMH, Zubair Mohamed, meanwhile told daily newspapers Haveeru that departures from the hospital were a “normal occurrence” and that “doctors are always leaving because their contract has expired.”

Because of its reliance on expatriates staff, particularly from India, the Maldives is also competing with the burgeoning Indian medical sector to attract staff.

“Even in Indian government hospitals, which have to compete with the private sector, a medical officer in Delhi undergoing training would get 52,000 Indian rupees, around 16,000 -17,000 Rf,” Shiham said.

Moreover, Male in particular was proving an unattractive destination for foreign staff because of high living costs and the need to leave families behind. The lack of facilities was also professionally unsatisfying, a particular issue for attracting senior staff, he explained.

“Here [at IGMH] I am only able to do 30-40 per cent of what I am trained to do because of a lack of facilities – out on an island, maybe five percent. Even equipment for kidney biopsies or needle for taking bone marrow samples. Doctors’ skills are underutilised and referrals overseas are common practice.”

Impact

The loss of medical staff is placing pressure on those who remain and affecting the amount of time doctors have to see patients, Shiham said.

The rule is we see four patients an hour, 15 minutes for each,” he said. “If we start seeing a patient every 5-6 minutes, then the patient is not being seen properly, even if he might be happy he’s seen a doctor. The level of documentation will also go down, and that will later attract a lot of litigation. The patient loses, the doctor loses and the system loses.”

Appointments were starting to being made through contacts, a situation Shiham describes as “embarrassing.” The pressure to thin the growing queues of patients was also leading to staff being recalled from other critical roles.

“I cannot stomach it when a medical officer is pulled off ICU (intensive care) to see a few more flu patients just because people are starting to shout outside. We don’t have a doctor on duty 24/7 in our critical care unit,” he said.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Letter on MPs’ pay cut

Dear Editor,
The behavior of MPs in the Maldives is purely disgusting. Whether opposition or not, I do not understand why any MP should have a problem taking a pay cut. They earn a lump sum, this is not their only source of income and many of them do not even live up to the responsibilities of being an MP! It is ridiculous to say that the country is not going through hard times. Anyone with the ability to retain and process information will undoubtedly know and understand about the global recession and how the Maldives is being affected by it. Just how stupid does these politicians think the average Maldivian person is? Also to think that the government does not have Rf7 billion in revenue is a nightmare! The comment about MPs being personal bankers. Now I do not know whether that is true or not, but the fact that this was a comment made by an MP (without any shame) means that he undermines the reform process…All of this makes the reform and the idea of an “Anneh Dhivehi Raaje” sound like a mere joke! What a laugh!
Regards,
Khadeeja Hamid

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Letter on sale of alcohol

Dear Editor,
In my opinion, the Maldivian society is not educated well enough on Islam. Islam remains as a second thought to many Maldivian citizens, particularly among the younger people.
Most of the younger Maldivians wouldn’t even give a second thought about drinking alcohol. They won’t remember how it is banned in Islamic sharia, and the sin they commit by drinking it. Some of them even crave for an opportunity to drink that stuff.
Even now, it’s too easy to obtain alcohol. Allowing sale of alcohol on inhabited islands would result in total chaos! It would open up a new form of drug that is already being restricted in several non-muslim countries.
I wouldn’t mind the ban being lifted, as long as the sales are strictly monitored, and abusers of alcohol are given hefty punishment (in Britain, for example, a shopkeeper could go out of business for selling alcohol to a juvenile). The problem is that people in the Maldives already don’t get enough punishment even for serious crimes, such as adultery, rape, etc (some even get released!). This would encourage more people to take part in such crimes, because they know that they won’t get serious punishment for it!
I believe that allowing the sales of alcohol in the current Maldivian society is not sensible. Unless the Maldivians are taught more about Islam, and younger people are taught about how dangerous drugs and alcohol are, our society isn’t safe.
Regards,
Anonymous

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Letter on IGMH

Dear Editor,
It’s about time the government did something to improve the facilities and services at the IGM Hospital. My last visit to the place was a nerve racking experience and the place is clearly overloaded with patients. The ER looks more like its dealing with a disaster. There are people along the corridor to the extended area and you can barely walk with the beds on both sides. On Saturday there were at least five women in labour waiting for the doctor or a place in the labour room. Three patients that were supposed to be put into ICU were left in ER due to the ICU being full. There were no rooms available and the wards were full. The corridor leading up to the laboratory smelled of s**t and I’m not s***ing you.
The mismanagement of the past regime is visible but now it reflects very badly on the current goverment. The hospital has been largely ignored by the democratic sarukaaru [government]. While privatisation was announced just last week, I for one don’t think that the place can handle the current numbers. All the doctors look tired and overworked. Health Minister Aiminath Jaleel is clearly not a capable choice. Yes, we know that the former goverment was corrupt, it didn’t care about the people – that’s why we elected you to govern. Be the change that you promised, no more sick leaves.
Regards,
Aishath Maleesha

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Contentious article of Child Sexual Abuse Act to be reassessed

The president’s office has said it will reassess article 14 of the Child Sex Abuse (Special Provisions) Act, which some have argued could provide a means of evasion for paedophiles.

The long overdue Act categorises child sex offences for the first time in the Maldives and contains harsh sentences of up to 25 years for those convicted.

But under article 14, if an adult is legally married to a child under Islamic sharia, none of the offences specified in the Act will be considered a crime. 

Although the Act was ratified earlier this month, the contentious article has elicited a strong reaction from NGOs and children’s rights activists for potentially providing a loophole for child sexual abuse.

President’s Office Press Secretary Mohamed Zuhair said today the government would reconsider the article as the Maldives was signatory to international treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). 

“It’s a concern for us and the government will work to revise it and overturn it,” said Zuhair.

Loophole

Although MPs did not deliberate the contentious article during the parliamentary debate on the bill, it was brought to public attention on Thursday by Mansoor Ali, Unicef representative to the Maldives, and Vice President Dr Mohamed Waheed.

“MPs like everyone are scared to approach any subject to do with religion and refute anything to do with religion,” explained Zuhair.

At an event to mark World Day for Prevention of Child Abuse, the vice president said he hoped article 14 would be re-examined. “If someone tried to take advantage of a loophole in the law to do this, it’s an even bigger crime,” he said.

Mansoor told Minivan News today that during his speech on Thursday, he appealed both to the government and to MPs to review the article, which he believed was in conflict with the CRC.

“I am not trying to challenge religion. My concern is that this goes against the spirit and content of the CRC,” he said.

He added the legislation should be linked to the Family Act, under which child marriage is admissible.

While the national age of marriage is 18 in the Maldives, as a Muslim country, girls below this age can marry with parental and state consent.

Child marriage

For many who Minivan News spoke to today regarding article 14, child marriage was the larger issue at stake. For the president, said Zuhair, child marriage was a matter of great concern.

Former Attorney General Azima Shukoor said she supported Unicef’s appeal for the article to be re-evaluated although not necessarily deleted.  
Azima said the chief judge of the family court had recently expressed concern about young girls being taken out of the Maldives for marriages which were not recognised inside the country.

“How can a 12 or 13-year-old give consent to being married? My concern is that it defeats a lot of the purpose of the bill,” she said.

In July, four local NGOs made recommendations to a parliamentary committee reviewing the bill.

In their recommendations, Maldivian Detainee Network, Rights for All, Madulu and Transparency Maldives, called for the removal of article 14.

The NGOs said that as consent for sex was required even within a marriage, any kind of non-consensual “touching” of a child should be considered an offence under the Act.

Family Act

But, MP for Kulhudhufushi South Mohamed Nasheed, who submitted the bill, told Minivan News today, that legislation could not “encroach into a lawful marriage”.

As underage marriages are permitted, “child marriage cannot be put under a child sexual abuse bill,” he said, adding that there was no legislation for marital rape in the Maldives.

Nasheed said that it would be necessary to find out the number of underage marriages and how many of them were to children below the age of 16.

“If it’s a serious concern and we realise there are people marrying young children for a short time for a certain purpose, then we have to revise the Family Act,” said Nasheed.

In agreement was Mohamed Shaheem Ali Saeed, state minister for Islamic affairs, who said article 14 was not in conflict with the law.

While the ministry would strive to combat child abuse, he said, underage marriage was legal in the Maldives.

“The principle in Islam is that the child has to mature physically and sexually and there has to be the financial means to look after the family,” said Shaheem.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Bill outlawing places of worship for non-Muslims “useless”

The bill on outlawing places of worship for non-Muslims is a “useless” piece of legislation, Sheikh Hussein Rasheed Ahmed, president of the religious conservative Adhaalath party has said.

Speaking to Minivan News today, Rasheed said there were more important bills proposed by the government, such as the bill on taxation and the revised penal code.

“Some members are just trying to show that they’re doing something by proposing these useless bills to waste the Majlis’ time,” he said.

He added MPs were delaying the passage of legislation submitted by the attorney general that would be beneficial to the public and necessary for the government to function.

Last week, a bill proposed by Independent MP Ibrahim Muttalib on outlawing places of worship for non-Muslims was sent to committee with unanimous consent.

“There hasn’t been a temple built in this country so far even without this bill,” said Rasheed.

Unlike countries such as Lebanon and Nigeria, which had large non-Muslim communities, he said, the Maldives was a 100 per cent Muslim country.

“Since the constitution states all citizens have to be Muslims, there’s no need to build temples here,” he said.

But, he added, foreigners in the country should have the right to pray in the privacy of their homes.

Muttalib was the former treasurer of Adhaalath party, but was dismissed from the post following a dispute with the party.

Rasheed said he criticised the party in public after a proposal he made did not garner support.

“He has now sent a letter and resigned from the party,” he said.

Legal vacuum

Muttalib told Minivan News today he proposed the bill because there was no law to prevent the establishment of places of worship for non-Muslims.

He referred to article 19 of the constitution, which states “No control or restraint may be exercised against any person unless it is expressly authorised by law.”

“So there has to be a law to deal with this,” he said. “I did not propose it because I was pressured by any party.”

Muttalib said foreign elements were keen on establishing churches in the Maldives, as it was among only four countries, including Saudi Arabia, Mauritania and Iran, that did not have any churches.

While he could not name any particular organisation, Muttalib said a British delegation that met with senior members of Adhaalath party recently told them “this is not why we helped you bring democracy”.

“They said we helped you bring democracy so that we can worship here,” he said.

On MPs who had claimed the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) allowed Jews to worship in Medina, Muttalib said he heard Sheikh Hassan Fikry retort on DhiFM that verses were later revealed commanding the Prophet to “throw them out”.

“They are unclean people,” he said. “They will not wish any good for us.”

Further, he continued, the Qur’an cautioned against friendship with Jews and Christians as they would not accept Muslims until they converted to their religions.

On Sheikh Rasheed’s criticism, Muttalib said despite their political differences he did not wish to challenge the Adhaalath Party president.

He called on the party to free itself from the government and speak out on important religious issues.

The party’s failure to speak out was causing public loss of confidence and ruining the reputation of religious scholars, he said.

“This is a very important time for the Adhaalath Party to come out and speak,” he said.  

Inquiries

Mohamed Zuhair, president’s office press secretary, told Minivan News today a number of inquiries had been made with the president’s office on the extent of religious freedom in the country.

On Friday, President Mohamed Nasheed asked for the ruling under Islamic sharia on allowing non-Muslims to worship in Islamic communities.

Zuhair said the Fiqh academy of the Islamic ministry will debate the matter and issue a ruling.

“We want to be very clear about this before we give a final answer,” he said.

Muttalib said he believed the president would ratify the bill if parliament passed it.

“I think what he expressed was the pressure that he is facing from the international community, from Jews and Christians,” he said.

National pride

Zuhair said the president’s office had received comments from foreigners who said they cancelled their holidays after learning of women being flogged and the public’s attitude towards corporal punishment.

He further said inquiries were made on the president’s office website about the possibility of tourists getting married in the Maldives.

“Marriage tourism is a growing segment,” he said. “We’ve had tour operators ask us if their clients getting married in the Maldives would be considered a religious ceremony.”

Presenting the legislation, Muttalib said the government’s plans to introduce wedding tourism would “indirectly” establish churches in the country.

“I want to say categorically that the government will not allow building temples or churches in the Maldives,” said Zuhair, adding claims during the presidential election that a Nasheed administration would build temples were completely unfounded.

Kulhudhufushi MP Mohamed Nasheed, an independent, said the bill was proposed after international organisations had discussions with MPs and the government “asking for more complete rights in the name of democracy.”

“It is a matter of national pride for Maldivians rather than a question of religion,” he said.

As other Islamic states allowed places of worship for non-Muslims, he said, the question of banning non-Muslims from worshipping publicly under Islamic sharia was “debatable”.

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)