Return to politics casts Gayoom as the one who undermined democracy in the Maldives, not introduced it: Eurasia Review

Gayoom’s return to active politics is creating instability in a country that is trying to manage a smooth change over from three decades of authoritative rule to one of multi party democracy, writes Dr S Chandrasekharan for the Eurasia Review.

“In my view his entry may cause some ripples, but this will not change the steady consolidation of democracy that is already taking place. The MDP under the present President Nasheed is seen to be gaining strength though confrontational politics may continue for long until the party gains sufficient strength in the Majlis.

A case in point is the observation made by Gayoom in a meeting to mark the seventh anniversary of the introduction of the Reform Agenda during his regime. He said that Maldivians never had a true democracy (his regime included) and made a famous statement: “ A system under which a country’s citizens live in fear of political oppression and persecution is not a democratic system at all.”

If he was referring to the period during his regime of thirty years, one cannot but agree but it is not so now. Did he not jail the present president under terror laws when the latter was protesting peacefully during his regime? Did he not hound out his predecessor Ibrahim Nasir and his whole family and relatives and banished them from the country? After making a deal with the ruling party, and accepting generous retirement benefits, is he not trying to come back to politics by trying to demolish a leader chosen by him as his successor in the party created by him?

To cap it all, he said that true democracy could only be delivered to the Maldivian people by winning the 2013 presidential election. Perhaps he is referring to himself!

This can be seen from the fact that Gayoom formally took over the leadership of the rival DRP faction known as Z-DRP (Zaeen DRP) on 1st of June this month. A formal meeting between representatives of Thasmeen Ali’s DRP (original DRP!) and that of Gayoom took place some days ago but the differences appear to be irreconcilable. Thasmeen Ali is no “push over” either and he has many supporters still.

Gayoom is thus not helping democracy when he weakens the present opposition which is formidable and does keep the government in check. Worse still, unverified allegations inspired by Gayoom and his supporters questioning Thasmeen’s integrity are being made just to discredit the latter.

Gayoom as I had said many times before could have remained in the history of Maldives as the one who had brought in true democracy to country and instead he is likely to be remembered as the one who tried to undermine a fledgling democracy!”

Read more

Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

One thought on “Return to politics casts Gayoom as the one who undermined democracy in the Maldives, not introduced it: Eurasia Review”

  1. Qayoom is a shameless Islamic c cleric; this ever local understand well.
    The few people who are supporting him and his family are those who gained financial benefits during his dark 30 years rule.
    The man is dud and he simply does not understand economics; now it seems the suppressed population of Maldives won’t economical well beings for all. Which of cause the mullah have no ideas about? The only things he can talk are of Islam and promise the Maldivians a secure place in high evens.
    Wonder why this nasty old man doesn’t secure a good place in heaven for himself!

    Likes(0)Dislikes(0)

Comments are closed.