Parliament should appoint a ‘Sergeant-at-Arms’ to enforce order, not the MNDF, says Independent MP

Independent MP Mohamed Nasheed has called for parliament to appoint a ‘sergeant-at-arms’ to enforce discipline in the chamber, after weeks of disrupted sessions caused by rowdy MPs.

The situation came to a head today, with the Maldives National Defence Force (MNDF) on standby to ensure the continued functioning of the legislature.

Deputy Speaker Ahmed Nazim terminated the session this morning after opposition MP Ali Arif refused to leave the chamber on instruction. The military was not deployed in the chamber.

Minivan News last week witnessed MPs from former President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom’s ‘Z-DRP’ faction of the opposition chasing Speaker of Parliament Abdulla Shahid as he left the parliament chamber. Journalists and the public were subsequently removed from the gallery.

“I think that was a bit extreme. In my opinion it should not have got to that level,” said MP Nasheed today. “No one person or party within an institution should be capable of bringing it to a halt, be it a minister of cabinet, a judge on the bench or a member of a commission.”

At the same time, “parliament being parliament, the nature of the beast is that we allow a greater latitude for sentiment.”

The government’s decision to deploy the military to ensure order in the chamber was “not sensible”, he observed: “That is a shortcut.”

The key issue, he said, was that the new parliament had not yet applied rules in its regulation governing enforcement of discipline through the formal appointment of a Sergeant-at-Arms, as provided for.

“We have instead focused on the greater latitude and freedoms to say what we think,” he said.
“We have seen occasional sporadic disruption, and sometimes organised disruption – by both major parties.”

“That scenario has led to a cumulative ignoring of discipline. MPs used to stand in their chairs, then they went up to other members, now they go right up to the secretariat. That is a line that hasn’t been crossed yet, and discipline has deteriorated,” Nasheed said.

Despite last week’s pursuit of the Speaker, there was “no risk of physical harm”, he suggested. “I don’t think parliament has got to the level where MPs will personally inflict physical harm on the Speaker.”

Nasheed recommended the Majlis follow the example of other parliaments and allocate a force under the direction of a Sergeant-at-Arms, to enforce discipline.

“Some parliaments have a paramilitary force, while others have a unit of the army or police seconded to parliamentary security,” Nasheed explained. “They have a different uniform and answer to the speaker. Given our resources I think it is fine to take a police or military unit and second it to parliament, under a man we appoint as sergeant-at-arms.”

The disruption of parliament by the opposition MPs comes scarcely weeks after the publication a ‘Parliament Watch’ report by NGO Transparency Maldives, which noted that a quarter of all sittings held last year ended in disruption.

Parliament’s first votes of the June session saw MPs voting against a motion to cut a controversial Rf20,000 in committee allowances – an effective 33 percent salary increase that sees Maldivian MPs earning on par with those in Sweden. A quarter of the chamber was absent during the vote.

At the same time, Transparency Maldives noted that key bills of national interest, including bills vital to the state and preservation of justice, such as the evidence bill, right to information bill, political parties bill, penal code bill and drugs bill “remain stagnated at committee stage”.

MP Nasheed dismissed ruling party speculation that the present disruptions were an attempt by the opposition to delay the passing of such bills, although he acknowledged that “Yes, the agenda will suffer because of this.”

“Half the session has been consumed because of this delay over the constitution of committees, but I don’t think the opposition is deliberately trying to disrupt the agenda,” he said, suggesting that the political divide and sentiments remained deep.

The opposition MPs have complained of the manner in which the ruling Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) last week gained control of parliament’s two most powerful committees, concerning finance and national security.

“Some people are objecting to the way the committees were constituted, others at the way it was endorsed in parliament,” Nasheed said.

“At 6:30pm MPs were sent an SMS message saying there would be a session at 8:30pm, lasting for five minutes, with one item on the agenda – the proposed parliamentary setup. Members did not take time look compositions, and there was no debate.”

Nasheed said that such an extraordinary vote was unnecessary, “as there was bipartisan support and it would most likely have been passed [anyway] during normal voting hours.”


11 thoughts on “Parliament should appoint a ‘Sergeant-at-Arms’ to enforce order, not the MNDF, says Independent MP”

  1. The inability of both major parties to compromise is surely worrying.

    The MDP/T-DRP/independent coalition has gotten heavy-handed in recent days in trying to enforce its decisions.

    Also, the Z-DRP is seen to act like a stubborn baby as well as it tries to muster enough strength to regain lost political clout. PA and JP as well as some independents also are seen to remain in opposition.

  2. If Arif is so concerned about upholding the Parliament rules and regulations why didn't he leave the chamber today when he was asked to leave? This is what we call double standards.

  3. It is not a good idea to have a 'Sergeant at arms in the parliament when there is a regulation that gives the same power to MNDF. It will become more chaotic.

  4. There's nothing the Speaker, MNDF or a Sergeant-at-arms can do to make a person like Ali Arif think. In future the people should not vote for such donkeys.

  5. People like Arif belong in the Zoo. Too bad we don't have one.

    Why bother appointing a Sergeant t Arms for the Parliament? As it is we are talking about in creased costs of the State. I see no reason to employ some one just to throw these thugs out of Majlis Chamber when the MNDF personnel are just outside the Chamber's door.

    I say just let the MNDF throw out Nihan, Mahloof and Arif next time they try to be too smart and try to disrupt the Majlis.

    Where is the logic in creating more procedure to deal with some thugs who are disobeying the very rules of the Majlis that these jokers are claiming that they are accusing the Speaker of not following!

    I find it offensive that the Hon MP from Kulhudhuffushi Nasheed dismissing the seriousness of the havoc being created by the likes of Arif by calling to allow "greater latitude to express sentiment" in the Majlis in reference to the animal behavior of the Z-DRP thugs. Who gave the right to these thugs to waste the time of the State and to waste Public Funds by disrupting the Majlis while collecting their Fat Pay Checks without doing their jobs!

  6. If only we could learn to vet these peole before they are allowed to stand for election in the first place. Most decent and intelligent people would now not even consider standing for parliament as they are disgusted by what they see.

    This band of disjointed and corrupt individuals is slowly but surely dragging us back to the very bottom of the developed nations pile. Keep going guys, soon we will get no help from anywhere else and all decent people will have migrated.

    Wake up and get on with representing the people who elected you or get out!

  7. I call upon MP Nasheed to keep quiet bcos you are not the right person to comment on such issues....U are a notorious MP totally depending on the generous financial support (Harraam money) from the Power-hungry crooks like the Notorious Burumaa

  8. Does Ali Arif have a mandate not to work and prevent others from working, in the Majlis, from his electorate? Isnt he violating my Constitutional rights by obstructing my PM from representing me in the Majlis?

  9. I don't see why Ali Arif or for that matter any politician should compromise....

    Politicians in mature democracies behave well (most of the time) not because they are any better, it's because the people who voted them in will not accept mediocrity. Parties would force MPs caught up in scandals to resign, lest their image be tarnished by association.

    Voter decisions keep parties and MPs in line, nobody depends on the altruism of people elected to high office.

    Ali Arif is as smart as any other politician. If behaving like a lunatic gets approving nods, that's what he should do. A conversation will only be as intelligent as the dumbest participant.

    My 1 year old niece throws her water bottle, cries over the spilled water and repeats the process....she needs time to understand that it is her actions which brings her misery.

  10. “Some parliaments have a paramilitary force, while others have a unit of the army or police seconded to parliamentary security,” Nasheed explained.

    “They have a different uniform and answer to the speaker. Given our resources I think it is fine to take a police or military unit and second it to parliament, under a man we appoint as sergeant-at-arms.”



    Perhaps this force must be armed too!
    And they obey only commands of the Speaker!

    Wonder how much cash can be made for this kind of wishful thinking and bright ideas to do one thing!!!!


Comments are closed.