Policing not affected by reduction of ministerial powers, insists Umar Naseer

The restriction of the home minister’s prerogative to order individual police officers has not affected police effort’s to combat gang violence, Home Minister Umar Naseer insisted in parliament today.

Appearing for minister’s question time, Naseer explained that the home minister could no longer issue direct orders to police officers due to “changes” made to his mandate by President Abdulla Yameen, who exercised “his discretion under the law”.

“However, there has been no change to the role of police in this country. Police are fulfilling their responsibilities and will continue to do so,” Naseer insisted, adding that “special measures” were being taken to ensure security in the capital Malé.

The opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) alleged yesterday that “the present climate of fear in Malé and several islands began to escalate following [Naseer’s] constitutional powers as the minister in charge of police being reduced”.

Local daily Haveeru reported last week that President Yameen’s decision to reduce the home minister’s powers came after Naseer ordered police officers to investigate Tourism Minister Ahmed Adeeb – deputy leader of the ruling Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM) – for alleged unlawful activities.

Contrary to Naseer’s remarks today, President’s Office Spokesperson Ibrahim Muaz Ali had denied any changes to the home minister’s mandate.

Crime wave

Naseer meanwhile told MPs today that a “special police operation” was ongoing to curb gang violence in the capital following a spate of violent assaults during the past six days.

Naseer suggested that the problem was exacerbated by insufficient police resources, revisions required for “some laws”, and drug trafficking.

Crime in the Maldives stemmed from drug use, Naseer said, adding that efforts to combat drug trafficking have increased “manifold” under the current administration.

Efforts were currently underway to renovate and upgrade the rehabilitation centre in Himmafushi, he noted.

The government would continue “supply reduction” and “harm reduction” efforts, he added, reiterating that a period of 15 years would be needed with a “sustained effort” by successive administrations to address the country’s drug problem.

Asked by PPM MP Ahmed Nihan if there was any intelligence information suggesting that opposition politicians were behind the gang violence in a “deliberate attempt to incite unrest”, Naseer said he could not share confidential information at “an open forum”.

“But I would say that it is likely that scheming by some people might be involved in what’s going on now,” he said.


Naseer was summoned to the People’s Majlis today after a question was tabled by MDP MP Eva Abdulla concerning his allegations made in the wake of losing the PPM presidential primary to Yameen in March 2013.

Naseer had contended that the election was “rigged” and alleged that criminal gangs, convicts and drug smuggling “networks” were part of Yameen’s campaign team.

The PPM subsequently expelled Naseer from the party after he refused to apologise.

Asked how far any investigation of the president’s links to gangs and drug trafficking had progressed, Naseer said he was not legally obliged to answer the question as the remarks preceded his appointment as home minister and was not related to his present duties.

Naseer had previously retracted the allegations and categorically asserted that there were no links between Yameen and criminal enterprises.

In an interview with Minivan News in January, Naseer had dismissed the allegation as “political rhetoric” borrowed from the MDP.

Moreover, in April, Naseer told state broadcaster Television Maldives that he was “not a political threat” to Yameen.

At today’s sitting, Naseer repeatedly alleged that former President Mohamed Nasheed encouraged drug use and had resigned in “a state of intoxication”.

Nasheed would test positive for drug use “even if his urine is tested right now,” Naseer said.

Moreover, Nasheed was responsible for attacks against police officers and their families following the transfer of power in February 2012, he claimed.

In followup questions, MDP MPs suggested that Naseer could not answer truthfully for fear of losing his job.

Naseer responded by saying that he would not hesitate to order investigations of senior government officials “if a case reaches me.”

MDP MP Imthiyaz Fahmy meanwhile argued that Naseer by his own admission must have been lying either in parliament or when he made the allegations against Yameen last year and asked whether he had apologised either to the president or the public.

Naseer said he had “nothing to apologise for” and suggested that MDP leaders should apologise for causing MVR200 million worth of damage by allegedly setting fire to police stations, vehicles and courts on February 8, 2012.

Asked by an irate MP ‘Reeko’ Moosa Manik – former MDP chairperson – if provoking the main opposition party was part of his mandate, Naseer said he was “responding in kind” to MDP MPs’ “pestering” questions.

The deputy speaker advised Naseer to show more respect to a party with the support of over 105,000 people.


3 thoughts on “Policing not affected by reduction of ministerial powers, insists Umar Naseer”

  1. Very true. MPS-backed drug trafficking has experienced a surge as it consolidates a heroin monopoly in Maldives.

    "Prosecuting criminals and keeping citizens safe? Pftch, naah. That's laadheenee."

  2. Money and power. That's what everyone wants. Whoever who thinks otherwise is just naive. There are no angels, just demons.

    Gaza is a golden hen for arms-sales, and raping their wealth, in the name of helping to settle the conflicts. The conflicts are kept aflame, by the same people, so that they will always be able to 'help'.

    Here Umar, is doing everything he can, to stay in power. If Yameen chucks him lose, his tune will change 180 degrees.

    Reality and greed, are not on the page. His stories are fake and his days are numbered. For his part, the president will toy with Umar, until he has lost his advantage with this character.

  3. If someone mocks the Maldivian society, why do fishermen get upset? If you listen to Umar and the MPS in Majlis, what you grab out of it? Of course it shows that all this government, Majlis, courts and the whole Maldivian institutions are useless unnecessary. Silly MPS’ questions were; why umaraa, you talked about my husband, or why Umaraa, you said bad thing about your president, why I am getting death threats, or why there are gang violence. The question is, is this why people elected them? I thought people don’t care about their personal disputes. May be people would have liked to question Umar to explain his plans to curb violence and discuss about such plan and if it is good assist him to implement such plan. Eva the great MP, I think she is immature child, crying like baby , why it is so important for you what Umar said against his president , definitely people don’t care so why you bother. Or if you get death threats just take extra care don’t go alone keep some body guards, frankly speaking, you must always be confidential with such threats, just share it with Police or you don’t trust the police share it with your husband only , making public you are more at risk. Being democracy advocate, you may lobby to strength democratic institution; fight for homosexual rights, religious freedom, equal rights for women, abolish Sharia, more jobs, change school curriculum to educate to create new generation to fit in to 21st century.


Comments are closed.