The parliament has granted powers to the tourism ministry to authorise developments on resorts in a move critics say will weaken the environment protection regime, and pave the way for corruption.
Amendments to the tourism law passed today transfers to the tourism ministry the Environment Protection Agency’s (EPA) powers to evaluate environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and authorise projects such as land reclamation. The agency functions as an independent body under the environment ministry.
Voting on the bill submitted by government-aligned MP Mohamed Ismail took place amid continuing protests by opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) MPs.
It was passed with 41 votes in favour after Speaker Abdulla Maseeh Mohamed asked for a show of hands.
If the amendments are ratified, resorts will have to seek authorisation from the tourism ministry for any development that could “permanently alter” the island, plot of land, or lagoon’s environment. The ministry must evaluate an EIA report before issuing permission.
EPA permanent secretary Ajwad Musthafa told the economic affairs committee during its review of the legislation last week that “the independent checks and balances system will be lost” if the regulatory powers are transferred to the tourism ministry.
The move amounts to allowing the tourism ministry to “self-regulate,” he contended.
The EIA process is the “main instrument” of the environment protection regime and adheres to international best practices, he said, noting that the reports are prepared by independent and qualified consultants.
Ajwad also objected to transferring technical experts to the tourism ministry as the agency’s “institutional capacity” was built up over a long period.
EPA director Miruza Mohamed meanwhile warned that the move could reduce funding from international donors.
However, the ruling party says “making the services available under one roof would ease the burden on investors, speed up services, and improve investor confidence.”
The involvement of other ministries and institutions in regulating resorts hinders the tourism ministry and “lowers investor confidence”.
The new provisions state that “only the tourism ministry will have the authority” to conduct assessments and authorise development projects.
The tourism ministry will also have the power to impose fines not exceeding US$5 million for violations.
Transparency and accountability
Environmental NGO Ecocare warned that the move conflicts with the environment protection law – which requires the EPA to evaluate assessments – and could “pave the way for corruption”.
“Under this particular scenario we also feel that when EPA assess and evaluates EIA reports, it is a more transparent practice than leaving this to the Tourism Ministry, who carry out the evaluation and awarding of bids for tourist resorts,” Ecocare said in a press release today.
The current system put in place by the Environment Protection and Preservation Act includes checks and balances and assures transparency and accountability, Maeed Mohamed Zahir from Ecocare told Minivan News today.
With the changes to the law, an unscrupulous official at the tourism ministry can grant approval “regardless of the effect on the environment,” he said.
Opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) MP Fayyaz Ismail said at the committee last week that the tourism ministry presently “discriminates” in issuing and suspending operating licenses to resorts.
Fayyaz warned that officials could misuse the authority to approve development projects on resorts and selectively impose fines at whim.
MP Ali Fazad, a ruling Progressive Party of Maldives MP, also expressed concern with the amendments conflicting with the existing environment law as “two laws would have two [provisions] for the same thing”.
However, all ruling coalition MPs on the committee voted in favour of the bill and forwarded it to the parliament floor.
The law also introduces a new scheme to allow the extension of resort leases to 99 years for a lump sum payment of US$5 million.
The changes aim to incentivise investors, make it easier to obtain financing from international institutions, and increase revenue for the government.
To be eligible for a lease extension, a resort property must be operational with an existing lease period of 50 years and must not owe money to the government.
Under the current Tourism Act, the maximum lease period for resorts or hotels is 50 years. However, the constitution allows leases up to 99 years.
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Environment agency head demoted- Government proposes $5m resort lease extensions
- Government submits revenue raising bills to parliament
- President Yameen announces development of five resorts in Haa Dhaalu Atoll
- Parliament approves government’s revenue raising measures
- Former fisheries minister faces corruption charges over lease of Thun’bafushi to Champa Moosa
The whole purpose of this exercise is to open another stream of cash for the man handling the cash cow of Maldives.
And this piece is total hogwash:
However, the ruling party says “making the services available under one roof would ease the burden on investors, speed up services, and improve investor confidence.”
Then why not shut down all ministries, departments and institutions and transfer everything under "one roof" to the President's Office? Surely, that will maximise investor confidence to 100%!!
Hang on, that sounds familiar. Wonder where we've seen similar systems. Ah, reminds me of the Communist Party of some states that control everything under "one roof".
No one at the Ministry of Tourism has the guts to even say that it is not something they deserve. Otherwise the staff of Tourism ministry are happy as the PPM and the greedy resort owners. While many think tourism conserves the environment, the truth is it is also the destruction of this country. Bird habitats are lost. There is an economic term called "Natural Resource Curse" which happen when a country depent too much on a natural resource based industry. It is because of this tourism industry that other industries have not developed. Tourism industry is too powerful to crush any other thing that may come along. On the other hand only little affect it had been to the people's welfare. The very rich few become richer and richer. The money are gone to foreign banks...thats it.
If you cant beat them.. join them & enjoy a slice from the cake, now people must wait for release of Mandela.
Nah, I prefer to break in, take a slice of the cake, slice it to bits and throw it out to the people - then, for good measure, poison the rest of the cake with laxatives.