Members of parliament have expressed concern over recent remarks against Indian High Commissioner to the Maldives, D M Mulay, by President’s Office Spokesperson Abbas Adil Riza.
MPs debated the matter on Tuesday after a motion submitted by MDP MP Ibrahim ‘Bondey’ Rasheed, condemning government’s failure to take action against the spokesperson’s remarks.
Following criticism from the High Commission and the Indian government, the President’s Office published a statement distancing the government from Riza’s remarks.
During a rally organised by parties of the ruling coalition calling for the seizure and nationalisation of Ibrahim Nasir International Airport (INIA) from Indian infrastructure giant GMR, Riza described Mulay as a “traitor and enemy of the Maldives and the Maldivian people”, accusing him of taking bribes and threatening the government.
During the debate, MPs of the opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) condemned the remarks claiming they were made against diplomatic protocol and could affect bilateral relations with India.
Presenting the motion, MP Rasheed highlighted that GMR operates airports in New Delhi, Hyderabad and in Turkey. He added that Turkey also has a strong Muslim majority but the people there do not go out on to the streets calling to take back the airport in the name of protecting Islam.
Rasheed added that tourists would obviously see protesters hollering around the airport on boats, and that this could potentially harm foreign investment in the country.
He also added that after talking “nonsense” in front of the general public, a president’s spokesperson cannot later claim that he was expressing his “personal opinions”, and that a repeat of such actions could inflict irreparable damage to the economy.
“Act of terrorism”
Speaking on the motion, Deputy Parliamentary Group Leader of MDP MP Ali Waheed described the anti-GMR armada as an “act of terrorism”.
“What we saw yesterday was an act of terrorism. If the government wishes to terminate the contract with GMR that was entered into during the former government, then do it, instead of nonsense like this,” Waheed said.
He further added that Spokesperson Riza had made a huge blunder by speaking “so lowly” of the high commissioner, and the best thing for him to do was apologise or resign from his position as spokesperson.
Deputy leader of the government-aligned Jumhoree Party (JP) MP Abdulla Jabir echoed similar sentiments during the debate.
“What I saw was a group of terrorists who went to stop the businesses of this country and to take over those businesses in the international airport illegitimately. I condemn these actions and this is not something that should be repeated in this country ever again,” said Jabir.
MDP Spokesperson and MP Hamid Abdul Ghafoor said that during the MDP’s three year democratic government, the country saw a large number of foreign investors investing in the Maldives because of the trust those investors had in the government.
He added that India alone had contributed nearly a billion dollars to the Maldivian economy, and that GMR was one of the many that came through a transparent international bidding process with the technical assistance of International Finance Corporation (IFC), a group under the World Bank.
He expressed concern that if similar blunders were seen from the government, the Maldives risked losing the investor confidence gained over the last three years.
Meanwhile, MDP MP Eva Abdulla alleged that the remarks made by Riza were not those of his own but were rather under “direct orders” from President Mohamed Waheed Hassan.
“Indian government is involved in this conspiracy”: DQP MP Riyaz Rasheed
During the debate, the majority of former President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom’s Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM) MPs attempted to defend Riza, and tried to switch the focus on to High Commissioner Mulay.
In an apparent contradiction to its comments in parliament, the PPM on November 12 issued a statement dissociating the the party from the “slanderous” allegations made against Mulay.
Deputy leader and the only MP from the government-aligned Dhivehi Qaumee Party (DQP), MP Riyaz Rasheed made strong allegations against the Indian government, repeating Riza’s allegations against Mulay.
“[Mulay] is trying to declare the airport a property of the Indian government or the GMR group, and it is a fact that the Indian government working on the agenda as well,” he claimed.
Riyaz alleged that GMR and the Indian government were “eyeing” the MPs who spoke against them and that if those MPs travelled to India, he had information that GMR was “intending to plant drugs in their baggage.”
He also said it was saddening to see that a High Commissioner from the world’s largest democracy could not digest remarks made by the spokesperson, and added that there was a great difference between speaking in an official capacity and in an individual capacity.
Meanwhile, PPM MP Abdul Azeez Jamaal Aboobakr defended Riza, stating that a person’s freedom cannot be limited because of his employment, and that Riza too had his freedom of speech.
Aboobakr also highlighted that Riza had at the beginning of Friday’s speech said that he was going to make the remarks not in his official capacity as the spokesperson, but in an individual capacity.
Another PPM MP, Ahmed Mahloof, said the current government of President Waheed had all the needed powers to terminate the GMR agreement.
“This is something that could be done even sitting inside a luxurious air-conditioned room. All President Waheed has to do is decide on the matter,” Mahloof said.
He added that it was unnecessary to make a fuss out of the issue, referring to the anti-GMR boat armada, and that those who really wanted to terminate the GMR contract should have protested in front of the president’s office.
He also admitted that he could be subjected to allegations of taking bribes from his fellow MPs after making a remark in favour of GMR.
During the debate, MPs from the second largest political party Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party (DRP) followed the opposition MDP in condemning the remarks made by Riza.
DRP MP Ahmed Mohamed during the debate stated that he condemned the remarks made by Riza and Deputy Home Minister Ahmed ‘Boafan’ Abdulla during Friday’s rally.
“I call upon the government to settle this issue as soon as possible. I urge the government to finish the this issue before the political figures of this country begin to take advantage and politicise it,” he warned.
DRP MP Hussain Mohamed stated that the local party to the agreement was a 100 percent government owned company and therefore it was up to the government to make a decision.
Hussain Mohamed added that it was “utter nonsense” for political parties in government to come out and protest against the government.
Indian High Commissioner “traitor and enemy of the Maldives and the Maldivian people”: Riza
The debate stirred up in parliament followed remarks made by Riza during an anti-GMR rally held on Friday, calling the government to terminate the agreement with GMR – a 25-year concession agreement to develop and manage the airport, and overhaul the existing terminal while a new one is constructed on the other side of the island. The agreement represents the largest case of foreign investment in the Maldives.
“Trade between the Maldives and India reaches billions. Indian tycoons have the biggest share in Maldives tourism. Indian people are deepest in Maldivian business. We have to protect the businesses of those who import and sell potatoes and onions from India. We also have to protect the businesses of those who import gravel and sand from India. It should not be GMR that [Mulay] should take into account,” Riza declared during the rally.
“Today, like someone who has chilli smoke on his eyes, like someone who has ants at his feet who is threatening us Maldivians, the Indian ambassador here has forgotten what his job here in Maldives is. We are not in the mood to allow him to commit the crimes he is committing in our country,” he told as the crowd roared in support.
“A diplomat’s job is to work for his country and people and not to protect the interests of one private company… He is a traitor and enemy of Maldives and Maldivian people. We don’t want these kind of diplomats on our soil,
“Today we are also calling on for something else. On the day when we get GMR out of the Maldives, Mulay must also get out of here!” Riza said.
Riza’s comments were widely reported in Indian media.
Television channel Times Now described the “vicious targeting of the Indian envoy as leaving “a bitter taste”, and sparking a “huge diplomatic row”. The story had also been picked up by the Hindu and the Indian Express.
The remarks were quickly met with concern and condemnation by the Indian High Commission, which issued a statement dismissing the Presidential spokesperson’s allegations as being “against the diplomatic protocol”.
“We have told the government of Maldives that settling issues of huge mutual interest cannot be done on public space or on stage. This has to be done through discussion,” the High Commission said in a statement.
The Indian High Commission also made it clear that India would safeguard its interests including the investments of Indian companies.
Anti-GMR armada
On Monday afternoon, three days following Riza’s remarks, the anti-GMR campaign took to the seas in an effort to increase pressure on the government to “reclaim” INIA from the Indian infrastructure giant.
A seaborne armada of about 15 dhonis carrying flags and banners circled the airport as part of an ongoing campaign to annul the contract signed between the former government and GMR to manage and develop a new terminal at INIA.
Deputy Home Minister Abdulla told Haveeru that 50,000 people have signed the petition put together by a group of NGOs seeking to annul the agreement and nationalise the airport.
In response to the large number of boats circling the airport, the Maldives National Defence Force (MNDF) increased its seaborne presence to counter the rally, using coastguard vessels to block the entrance to the airport harbour.
MNDF Colonel Abdul Raheem told Minivan News: We had no major concern yesterday, we did not increase our military presence at the airport itself, instead we wanted to make sure that no one [from the protest] could enter the airport area from the sea.”
Adhaalath Party President Sheikh Imran Abdulla told Haveeru the protesters had no intention of disembarking at the airport and that the purpose of the rally was to “observe airport operations in the area”.
Last week Sheikh Imran gave the government a six-day ultimatum to annul the GMR agreement (by November 15).
Former President Mohamed Nasheed, whose government approved the deal in 2010, this month slammed statements over the “reclaiming” of the airport from GMR. Nasheed claimed such comments were “highly irresponsible”, stating that such words from the government could cause irreparable damage to the country.
The present government has continued to press to “re-nationalise” the airport, with the country’s Deputy Tourism Minister confirming to Indian media in September that the administration would not “rule out the possibility of cancelling the award [to GMR]”.
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Criminal Procedure Code Bill to include strong measures against hard-line offenders
Three DRP MPs defect to Jumhoree Party 
Names of five cabinet appointees sent to parliament for approval
MDP proposes bill allowing Speaker of Parliament to take charge after expiry of presidential term
Parliament fails to appoint new representative to JSC
Adhaalath Party head accused of attempting to influence ACC investigation into GMR
Everyone seems to be giving everyone else ultimatums these days. Sheikh Imran has given Waheed a week to get GMR out. MP Alhan Fahmy has given Waheed 6 days to re-instate Dr. Shamheed as Transport Minister. As a citizen I have an ultimatum for Qasim too. That Qasim divorce the latest 'Huvarafushi Drill Queen' or give up his claim to 'Maamigili Airport'.
Most important aspect of this incident is question whether a ‘public person' can speak any derogatory thing in a ‘private capacity’ ? And if one does, how should the government react?
I have a simple question. Imagine, tomorrow the Spokesman of Chinese President or Indian Govt comes out and says that there is a ‘coup government’ running in X country and the Head of govt of X country is a terrorist. Next day the Spokesman’s colleague will say that all these are his 'personal opinion’ and govt distances from it. Will that be ok for country X?
Any public figure will have to accept some restrictions on his freedom. The President of Maldives, for example’ can not just go whenever he likes to a street side coffee shop alone. He has to forego some freedom of movement & freedom to have privacy in this case.
A spokesman can speak in his PRIVATE CAPACITY only in a private get together but NOT IN A PUBLIC GATHERING.
If he does, the government must sack him, or will be seen as endorsing his public speech. One can’t run with the hare & hunt with the hound in this scenario.
If the High Commissioner of India has over stepped the boundaries in his dealings with the Maldives outside of the Vienna Convention the host nation may withdraw his diplomatic status under Article 9. To do this the Maldives Government must be 100% certain of the effects this will have on the general population. India will respond in such a way that could bring the country to it's knees. No trade, no financial assistance, no aid and this is one area you really need to understand fully, no aircraft may pass through India's air space on route to the Maldives, because they will refuse flight clearance. Only the worst case scenario, but if you annoy the biggest power in the region who happens to be your closest neighbour you will lose more than you think.
A sad day for us all when the hypocrisy and self-interest behind politics becomes too apparent to sustain an open democratic society in this country.
Yes, all political parties are basically a union of interests who develop and market a suitable candidate to dupe the masses while they secure said interests within the halls of power.
However, a country cannot go forward if the entire populace is jaded and disillusioned by the daylight robbery and blatant two-faced-ness displayed by our politicians.
Everyone needs to calm down and remember that there is a public watching and this whole thing can blow up in our faces if we don't make some concessions towards the average Maldivian.
Look at the growing apathy shown by the average voter. Count the figures that show the lack of confidence in newly introduced system. Our local governance system is a costly joke. Our executive is bulky and inefficient. Our Parliament is the political equivalent of pro-wrestling. Meanwhile the institutions established to secure the public interest including independent institutions and the judiciary are paralyzed out of fear of an opposition who uses physical threats and violence and political parties which use the Parliament to threaten them into acquiescence.
Something needs to be done to return trust in the system.
Before someone begins lecturing me about coups and what-not think about everything that happened before the transfer of power this year. This is just a continuation of that ugly battle.
agree with democratic friend
Pretty soon the Coalition will not be a coalition. Looks like as the election draws near, all these parties in the coalition will be trying whatever they can to get the better of the other parties and end up looking like fools. Riyaz and Mahloof do not have the brains to think about anything, they can only be loyal to their account balances. And Alhan, haha, fine person to be issuing ultimatums to anyone. What a bunch of jokers! Good luck Waheed.