Libyan government spokesperson Moussa Ibrahim said Gaddafi and his wife, who were present in the building, were unharmed in the attack that claimed the life of Saif al-Arab Gaddafi.
“We think now it is clear to everyone that what is happening in Libya has nothing to do with the protection of civilians,” Ibrahim told international media. “This is not permitted by international law. Nato does not care to test our promises, the west does not care to test our statements. Their only care is to rob us of our freedom.”
NATO and the defence ministries of countries involved in supporting Libyan regime change did not immediately comment on the attack. The UN resolution 1973 made in March does not explicitly permit or prohibit assassination of military leaders – Gaddafi is the de-facto head of the country’s armed forces – but it is mandated to use “all necessary measures” to protect civilians.
Fighting for key towns and oil ports continues as Gaddafi’s forces clash with NATO-backed rebels based in the eastern city of Benghazi. On Friday aid ships were blocked from docking at the port of Misrata – the scene of some of the civil war’s most vicious fighting – while coalition warships cleared mines laid by Gaddafi’s military.
Last month the Maldives suspended diplomatic ties with the Libyan government as Western powers increased military pressure on President Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.
“Following the recognition of the TNC, the suspension of diplomatic relations with the pro-Gaddafi regime is based on the continuing deteriorating human rights and humanitarian situation in Libya, and increasingly clear evidence that the Gaddafi regime is guilty of crimes against humanity and war crimes,” the Maldives Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
The statement came after the US accused Gaddafi of using human shields and cluster bombs against his own population in Misrata.
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
Libyan rebels push into Tripoli, arrest Gaddafi’s son- “Clear evidence of crimes against humanity”: Maldives suspends diplomatic ties with Libya
- Civilian shootings and talk of civil war as unrest grows in Syria, Libya and Yemen
- Moral complexities of Libyan intervention rising as Gaddafi prepares for “long war”
- Western military intervention in Libya imminent after skepticism over shaky ceasefire
- Maldives calls for support of Libyan rebels, rebels request air strikes
Coalition used Armor-Breaker!
It's super effective!. 😀
There is very little support in the UK for this war. Libya was in no way a threat to us, or to it's neighbours. The war is being pushed forward by Sarkozy and Cameron simply because Gadaffi was working towards nationalising Libyan oil. There was no other reason.
The last two paragraphs of your article contain blatant propaganda which has no factual basis. Libya, which was the ONE African country least in need of aid, and whose population enjoyed a quality of life and government support was unrivalled, will now become a failed state as a result of NATO meddling.
The war, by the way, was planned in November 2010, and the Benghazi uprising was part of the plan.
"The aim of these assaults is to establish the role of the major imperialist powers—above all, the United States—as the unchallengeable arbiters of world affairs. The "New World Order" is precisely this: an international regime of unrelenting pressure and intimidation by the most powerful capitalist states against the weakest"
(Noam Chomsky..written about the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia, but very true today)