The Human Rights Commission of Maldives (HRCM) has publicly revealed the names of those it considers responsible for the arbitrary arrest and detention of Criminal Court Chief Judge Abdulla Mohamed, despite previously stating that it did not wish to reveal the names for risk of prejudicing any court action.
In the shadow report on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in response to the Maldives initial state report submitted by the commission to UN Human Rights Committee in June, HRCM explicitly blames those responsible for the arbitrary arrest.
Article 71(iv) of the report reads: “It is conclusive to the investigation that the President and the Minister for Defense and National Security have to take the responsibility for arbitrary arrest and detention of the Chief Judge.”
Article 71(v) reads: “It is conclusive that it was the orders of the President to arrest Chief Judge as there was no action taken against the MNDF for disobedience to the orders of the Courts.”
However, in a press conference held on Wednesday, President of HRCM Mariyam Azra declined to give the names of those involved in the alleged abuse of the judge’s human rights. HRCM also declined to give any other details at present that it felt could influence any potential trials after charges were filed against Nasheed and several senior figures in the Maldives National Defense Force (MNDF) this week.
During the press conference, commission member Dr Ali Shameem spoke of the importance of having at least a “presence” of international human rights organsations at a time where the country was seeing violent political turbulence.
“I think it is very important that international human rights organisations have a presence – at least an office here in the Maldives – which we could easily reach on matters regarding human rights,” he said.
However, commission President Azra spoke against the views of the commission member, stating that she was of the view that it was “a domestic thing which we want to tackle ourselves.”
“I do not think we need an international presence. I believe the matter is a domestic thing and I am of the view that a local can be found,” she said.
During the press conference, members of the HRCM stated that their investigation had uncovered evidence that the judge, who was detained during the administration of former President Mohamed Nasheed over allegations that he posed a threat to national security, had faced attempts to remove him from his post and send him abroad.
The opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP), who had been in government during the time of Judge Abdulla’s detention, today raised concerns over what it claimed was the “complicit irresponsibility” of the HRCM – a body it alleged was biased towards the political interests of former President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom.
Furthermore, the commission used the press briefing to publicise its concerns that “efforts” had been made to “coerce” the judge to commit unspecified actions that would have contravened his human rights.
Speaking to Minivan News, Azra stated that she did had not declined to reveal the names of those who were found responsible, but said she had declined to suggest against whom the Prosecutor General (PG) should press charges.
“It is not my duty to say against whom the charges should be pressed. It’s the PG who will decide it,” she said.
“We have also sent a copy of the report to President Nasheed, the Defence Minister and all the concerned authorities,” she added.
She also stated that she had been unable to answer calls from Minivan News yesterday at time of press.
“Serious Concerns”
Responding to the press briefing, the opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) – of which Nasheed is the current presidential candidate – said it held “serious concerns” in the selective nature of the HRCM’s investigations.
MDP MP Hamid Abdul Ghafoor alleged that the HRCM’s investigation had now formed the basis of criminal charges filed against Nasheed. The case was yesterday returned to the Prosecutor General’s (PG’s) Office after the Hulhumale’ Magistrate Court said it did not presently have jurisdiction to hear such a case.
In March, the Prosecutor General Ahmed Muizz told Minivan News that the completion of the Nasheed cases was being delayed whilst police reviewed certain aspects of the investigation.
Ghafoor claimed that the decision to move ahead with the charges this week raised questions about allegations of political influence on the HRCM and the information it made available to the PG’s Office.
“I believe there is a very strong link between the HRCM holding this media briefing today and Islamist factions linked to [former President] Gayoom,” he added. “This week this faction has been very active in lobbying the HRCM, the Police Integrity Commission (PIC) and even the president himself.”
Just last month, Deputy leader of the Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM) Umar Naseer has expressed his confidence that the Prosecutor General’s (PG) investigation into charges against former President Mohamed Nasheed will see his imprisonment before the scheduled elections in July 2013.
“We will make sure that the Maldivian state does this. We will not let him go; the leader who unlawfully ordered the police and military to kidnap a judge and detain him for 22 days will be brought to justice,” local paper Haveeru reported Naseer as having said.
(0)Dislikes
(0)Related Posts
State failed to follow majority of February 8 recommendations: HRCM - PPM lobbying to re-start Nasheed’s criminal trial
- Former Defense Minister denies charges in Hulhumale Magistrate Court
- Police arrest underage females from orphanage, detain in Maafushi prison
- Nasheed challenges former President Gayoom to also appear before parliamentary inquiry
- Nasheed first president summoned before Maldives Human Rights Commission
this is written by a person who adovocate MDP in twitter, facebook and his blog. this website is run by MDP affiliates..
whats wrong by saying that ? Is Anni is above the law ? If our law is for layman , then it is fine and people like Anni are above the law.
I support to change the constitution to make it only applicable to lower income people and not for rich and senior politician.
HRCM please get lost. The Commission members are blinded by the money paid to them by Gayoom and they can only see human rights from that old crony's perspective. Let's pretend not to see the police brutality and the rape, the abuse and the stabbings that are taking place in this society every day. What a bunch of loonies.
Do note that the members of the HRCM were appointed by the parliament only after President Nasheed's approval.
Just because the HRCM didn't give a Nasheed-positive report doesn't mean HRCM is any less credible.
Regarding the "Islamic factions" (Adhaalath Party of course)... is actually the same "Islamic faction" which made coalition with President Nasheed on 2008's presidential election against President Maumoon. The only way MDP can get international attention for their case is through usage of such provocative terms and so they do.
We need to see this from a wider angle. If Nasheed did commit a crime it should be dealt which is also the stance of the United Nations. Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rupert Colville stressed that any such proceeds must be handled with full respect to the due process rights and fair trial safeguards guaranteed by the Maldives' Constitution and international human rights treaty obligations.
Nasheed had been appointed as the presidential candidate of MDP for the year 2013 and that decision was made by the Gaumy Majilis of MDP way before than usual so that there would be pressure not to press any charges on him. The decision was in fact lobbied by President Nasheed himself solely for his self protection and I see no other reason as he always tend to claim he is not interested in the 'seat'. In fact the current protests are also lead by President Nasheed (which by the way was started when the political arena was considerably stable) so as to pressure the courts more importantly the Parliament so no cases of him could be even investigated. This was hinted in his tweets couple of days before the recent protests.
On the other hand, let's consider how President he is. During the time when the devastating tsunami hit this small-vulnerable-island-nation, President Nasheed was campaigning in the international arena to *stop giving aids* to the Maldivian government while the country was in desperate need of it like never - he clearly put his personal agenda in front of the nation although, luckily, there wasn't any significant impact. This question was directed at him on national television during the presidential election which he couldn't give an appropriate answer of course. Considering the present, President Nasheed would know how delicate the nation's economy is especially now given the high debts and improper and failure in using state sponsored financial instruments, but he started a treacherous international campaign calling tourists to boycott Maldives. When the nation is extremely dependent on the tourism industry such a move, especially by a former president is more or less a treason, I would say.
President Nasheed was never our president. He was elected because we had no choice. We had to oust President Maumoon and there wasn't any option other than electing Nasheed as it was his name on the ballot in addition to Maumoon's. The direct votes President Nasheed got in the initial round amounts to slightly less than 25%.
p.s. I wouldn't be checking back on so don't mind replying to my comments.
Listen to mode, = "rich people and politicians should be exempt from the constitution". Utter madness!
ahmed . u damn idiots does not under the context of my comments.
Because you are so ignorant and do not want to know the reality.
I am saying if our Anni is above the law and then it means that our law is only for the laymen not for the people with the money and not for high profile politician.
I thought you are a civilized guy but now it proves you are puppet and damn idiot who are just thinking from one else brain .
ahmed . u damn idiots does not know the context of my comments.
Because you are so ignorant and do not want to know the reality.
I am saying if our Anni is above the law and then it means that our law is only for the laymen not for the people with the money and not for high profile politician.
I thought you are a civilized guy but now it proves you are puppet and damn idiot who are just thinking from one else brain .
http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/press-releases/charge-of-former-maldives-president-mohamed-nasheed-received-with-dismay
HumanRights Commission, please do not bring out unfavourable reports against former Prez Nasheed.He has many powerful friends in UK and Commonwealth. They will punish this country if you anger Nasheed's friends.
Do not prossecute Nasheed even if he abducts a judge. Nasheed is above law.